Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search)
5 mean » _ mean (Expand Search), a mean (Expand Search), i mean (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search)
5 mean » _ mean (Expand Search), a mean (Expand Search), i mean (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
Flow diagram of the study.
Published 2023“…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
-
131
Baseline characteristics of patients.
Published 2023“…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
-
132
-
133
Spatial representation of mean annual soil loss increase/decrease derived with the different modeling centers (rows) and time steps (columns) with the SSP5-8.5.
Published 2023“…<p>Spatial representation of mean annual soil loss increase/decrease derived with the different modeling centers (rows) and time steps (columns) with the SSP5-8.5.…”
-
134
-
135
-
136
-
137
-
138
-
139
-
140