Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search)
-
381
-
382
HDAC1 knockdown significantly increases RGS10 expression while HDAC1 overexpression decreases RGS10 expression in chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells.
Published 2014“…<p><b>A)</b> Knockdown of HDAC1 increases RGS10 mRNA transcription. …”
-
383
-
384
-
385
-
386
-
387
-
388
-
389
-
390
-
391
-
392
The 2lox Lsd1 variant shows decreased binding to known interactors.
Published 2013“…For the two single point mutants, the M448V mutation has a more profound effect on CoREST binding. *: immunoglobulin heavy chain. …”
-
393
-
394
Thrombin-induced decreased lamellipodia protrusion frequency and actin stress fiber formation.
Published 2015“…Shortly after addition of thrombin (1 U/ml; 3 min image) there was a coordinated increase in actin at the periphery of cells (thin arrowheads) and around vesicles (very small arrows) followed by a sharp decline in protrusive activity. …”
-
395
-
396
Inflammation is not sufficient to account for decreased relative bacterial numbers in higher dose infection.
Published 2012“…<p>A) C57BL/6 mice or CCR2 KO mice receiving Gr1-depleting antibody were infected with either 10<sup>3</sup> or 10<sup>7</sup> NMII <i>Coxiella</i>. …”
-
397
ApoER2 expression increases Aβ production while decreasing Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) endocytosis: Possible role in the partitioning of APP into lipid rafts and in the regulat...
Published 2011“…The percent of ligand internalized at each time point is equal to the amount of ligand internalized divided by the total cell-associated ligand (see "Materials and Methods") Values are the mean average of triplicate determinations with S.E. indicated by . () Lysates were prepared from similarly transfected cells and equal amounts of protein were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE. …”
-
398
-
399
-
400