Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search)
-
221
Amplitude for A/L = 0.02.
Published 2025“…By increasing the surface roughness of the bluff body, the lock-in region decreases and as a result, the harvested power from that bluff body is reduced. …”
-
222
Amplitude for A/L = 0.03.
Published 2025“…By increasing the surface roughness of the bluff body, the lock-in region decreases and as a result, the harvested power from that bluff body is reduced. …”
-
223
-
224
-
225
-
226
-
227
-
228
-
229
-
230
-
231
-
232
-
233
What is the Optimal Size of the Quantum Region in Embedding Calculations of Two-Photon Absorption Spectra of Fluorescent Proteins?
Published 2020“…The presence of hydrophobic a.a. residues in the quantum region also non-negligibly affects both absorption spectra but decreases absorption intensity. …”
-
234
-
235
DART-ID decreases missing datapoints across runs.
Published 2019“…Only peptides seen in >50% of experiments are included. (<b>b</b>) Decrease in missing data across all runs after applying DART-ID, for SCoPE-MS and the two bulk sets from <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007082#pcbi.1007082.g004" target="_blank">Fig 4</a> at 1% FDR. …”
-
236
-
237
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…(C) In vCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.138 ± 0.065, APP/PS1 = 0.112 ± 0.035, p < 10<sup>−6</sup>, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 689 units from 6 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 651 units from 8 recording sessions). …”
-
238
-
239
-
240
The mean and standard deviation of parameters.
Published 2024“…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”