Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search)
-
6741
-
6742
-
6743
-
6744
-
6745
Annotation of Allosteric Compounds to Enhance Bioactivity Modeling for Class A GPCRs
Published 2020“…Endogenous ligands, such as hormones and neurotransmitters, bind to the orthosteric site, while synthetic ligands may bind to orthosteric or allosteric sites, which has become a focal point in drug discovery. Usually, such allosteric modulators bind to a protein noncompetitively with its endogenous ligand or substrate. …”
-
6746
Annotation of Allosteric Compounds to Enhance Bioactivity Modeling for Class A GPCRs
Published 2020“…Endogenous ligands, such as hormones and neurotransmitters, bind to the orthosteric site, while synthetic ligands may bind to orthosteric or allosteric sites, which has become a focal point in drug discovery. Usually, such allosteric modulators bind to a protein noncompetitively with its endogenous ligand or substrate. …”
-
6747
Annotation of Allosteric Compounds to Enhance Bioactivity Modeling for Class A GPCRs
Published 2020“…Endogenous ligands, such as hormones and neurotransmitters, bind to the orthosteric site, while synthetic ligands may bind to orthosteric or allosteric sites, which has become a focal point in drug discovery. Usually, such allosteric modulators bind to a protein noncompetitively with its endogenous ligand or substrate. …”
-
6748
Annotation of Allosteric Compounds to Enhance Bioactivity Modeling for Class A GPCRs
Published 2020“…Endogenous ligands, such as hormones and neurotransmitters, bind to the orthosteric site, while synthetic ligands may bind to orthosteric or allosteric sites, which has become a focal point in drug discovery. Usually, such allosteric modulators bind to a protein noncompetitively with its endogenous ligand or substrate. …”
-
6749
Data_Sheet_1_Hsa-miR-100-3p Controls the Proliferation, DNA Synthesis, and Apoptosis of Human Sertoli Cells by Binding to SGK3.CSV
Published 2021“…We revealed that miR-100-3p was expressed at a higher level in human Sertoli cells by 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) than 0.5% FBS. …”
-
6750
Results of parameter estimation and comparison.
Published 2025“…We then define the magnitude as the difference between the lowest and highest points of the head within a cycle. In the analysis, we demonstrate that this magnitude varies depending on length and position, thereby providing evidence that nods exhibit a structured pattern. …”
-
6751
Results of comparison between Model5 and Model9.
Published 2025“…We then define the magnitude as the difference between the lowest and highest points of the head within a cycle. In the analysis, we demonstrate that this magnitude varies depending on length and position, thereby providing evidence that nods exhibit a structured pattern. …”
-
6752
Distribution of nod lengths.
Published 2025“…We then define the magnitude as the difference between the lowest and highest points of the head within a cycle. In the analysis, we demonstrate that this magnitude varies depending on length and position, thereby providing evidence that nods exhibit a structured pattern. …”
-
6753
Terminology used in this study.
Published 2025“…We then define the magnitude as the difference between the lowest and highest points of the head within a cycle. In the analysis, we demonstrate that this magnitude varies depending on length and position, thereby providing evidence that nods exhibit a structured pattern. …”
-
6754
MAEs of each window size.
Published 2025“…We then define the magnitude as the difference between the lowest and highest points of the head within a cycle. In the analysis, we demonstrate that this magnitude varies depending on length and position, thereby providing evidence that nods exhibit a structured pattern. …”
-
6755
Screenshot of the corpus.
Published 2025“…We then define the magnitude as the difference between the lowest and highest points of the head within a cycle. In the analysis, we demonstrate that this magnitude varies depending on length and position, thereby providing evidence that nods exhibit a structured pattern. …”
-
6756
Results of comparison between Model5 and Model10.
Published 2025“…We then define the magnitude as the difference between the lowest and highest points of the head within a cycle. In the analysis, we demonstrate that this magnitude varies depending on length and position, thereby providing evidence that nods exhibit a structured pattern. …”
-
6757
Posterior distribution of fixed effects.
Published 2025“…We then define the magnitude as the difference between the lowest and highest points of the head within a cycle. In the analysis, we demonstrate that this magnitude varies depending on length and position, thereby providing evidence that nods exhibit a structured pattern. …”
-
6758
-
6759
-
6760