Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search)
-
1381
Surface Properties of Colloidal Quantum-Confined One-Dimensional Lepidocrocite Titanates: Insights into their Ion-Induced Gelation
Published 2025“…This, and their layered structure, allow for facile ion exchange and high colloidal stability, demonstrated by ζ-potentials of ≈ −85 mV at their unadjusted pH of ≈10.4. This is nearly maintained across a 20 to 70 °C temperature range, with only a slight decrease in stability. …”
-
1382
Surface Properties of Colloidal Quantum-Confined One-Dimensional Lepidocrocite Titanates: Insights into their Ion-Induced Gelation
Published 2025“…This, and their layered structure, allow for facile ion exchange and high colloidal stability, demonstrated by ζ-potentials of ≈ −85 mV at their unadjusted pH of ≈10.4. This is nearly maintained across a 20 to 70 °C temperature range, with only a slight decrease in stability. …”
-
1383
-
1384
-
1385
Impact of family communication on self-rated health of couples who visited primary care physicians: A cross-sectional analysis of Family Cohort Study in Primary Care
Published 2019“…The Korean version of the Family Communication Scale of Family Adaptation and Cohesion Evaluation Scale-IV was used to assess family communication, and a 5-point scale of SRH questions was used to assess the SRH status. …”
-
1386
-
1387
-
1388
-
1389
-
1390
-
1391
The mean and standard deviation of parameters.
Published 2024“…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
-
1392
The ANCOVA and Post_hoc results.
Published 2024“…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
-
1393
CONSORT flowchart.
Published 2024“…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
-
1394
Time to stabilization in the vertical direction.
Published 2024“…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
-
1395
The description of games.
Published 2024“…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
-
1396
The description of balance training.
Published 2024“…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
-
1397
-
1398
-
1399
-
1400