Showing 1,381 - 1,400 results of 109,172 for search '(( a point decrease ) OR ( 5 ((((point decrease) OR (fold decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.50s Refine Results
  1. 1381

    Surface Properties of Colloidal Quantum-Confined One-Dimensional Lepidocrocite Titanates: Insights into their Ion-Induced Gelation by Adam D. Walter (18597903)

    Published 2025
    “…This, and their layered structure, allow for facile ion exchange and high colloidal stability, demonstrated by ζ-potentials of ≈ −85 mV at their unadjusted pH of ≈10.4. This is nearly maintained across a 20 to 70 °C temperature range, with only a slight decrease in stability. …”
  2. 1382

    Surface Properties of Colloidal Quantum-Confined One-Dimensional Lepidocrocite Titanates: Insights into their Ion-Induced Gelation by Adam D. Walter (18597903)

    Published 2025
    “…This, and their layered structure, allow for facile ion exchange and high colloidal stability, demonstrated by ζ-potentials of ≈ −85 mV at their unadjusted pH of ≈10.4. This is nearly maintained across a 20 to 70 °C temperature range, with only a slight decrease in stability. …”
  3. 1383
  4. 1384
  5. 1385

    Impact of family communication on self-rated health of couples who visited primary care physicians: A cross-sectional analysis of Family Cohort Study in Primary Care by Seo Young Kang (6454154)

    Published 2019
    “…The Korean version of the Family Communication Scale of Family Adaptation and Cohesion Evaluation Scale-IV was used to assess family communication, and a 5-point scale of SRH questions was used to assess the SRH status. …”
  6. 1386
  7. 1387
  8. 1388
  9. 1389
  10. 1390
  11. 1391

    The mean and standard deviation of parameters. by Sadaf Sepasgozar Sarkhosh (20436143)

    Published 2024
    “…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
  12. 1392

    The ANCOVA and Post_hoc results. by Sadaf Sepasgozar Sarkhosh (20436143)

    Published 2024
    “…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
  13. 1393

    CONSORT flowchart. by Sadaf Sepasgozar Sarkhosh (20436143)

    Published 2024
    “…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
  14. 1394

    Time to stabilization in the vertical direction. by Sadaf Sepasgozar Sarkhosh (20436143)

    Published 2024
    “…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
  15. 1395

    The description of games. by Sadaf Sepasgozar Sarkhosh (20436143)

    Published 2024
    “…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
  16. 1396

    The description of balance training. by Sadaf Sepasgozar Sarkhosh (20436143)

    Published 2024
    “…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
  17. 1397
  18. 1398
  19. 1399
  20. 1400