Showing 2,041 - 2,060 results of 110,318 for search '(( a point decrease ) OR ( 5 ((point decrease) OR (((mean decrease) OR (a decrease)))) ))', query time: 1.68s Refine Results
  1. 2041
  2. 2042
  3. 2043
  4. 2044
  5. 2045

    Changes in neural activity were decreased in animals pre-exposed to 5-HT and <i>mod-1</i> mutants when the worms switched their locomotive direction. by Haruka Mori (8082215)

    Published 2019
    “…<p>(A–F) the neural activity of the RID changes during the transition periods from backward to forward locomotion (A–C) and from forward to backward locomotion (D–F) in the mock (A: p = 1.5 × 10<sup>−5</sup>; D: p = 5.5 × 10<sup>−13</sup>), 5-HT exposed (B: p = 0.092; E: p = 0.79), and <i>mod-1</i> mutant (C: p = 0.081; F: p = 0.93) groups. …”
  6. 2046

    <i>Ext1</i> mutant lungs exhibit a decrease in SHH-FGF10 signaling. by Hua He (120374)

    Published 2017
    “…<p>(A) qPCR analysis of key components of FGF signaling pathway in lungs from E14.5. …”
  7. 2047
  8. 2048

    Excel data file with all collected data. by Marcus Persson (20496333)

    Published 2025
    “…SD = 11.6) after the last day of treatment. 25% (n = 5) met the response criteria, with a mean time to response of 2.2 days (min = 1, max = 3. …”
  9. 2049
  10. 2050
  11. 2051

    Gap Δ versus <em>U</em> for different values of the anisotropy parameter <em>a</em> for the π-flux cubic lattice model at half-filling (from top to bottom, <em>a</em> = 0, 0.05, 0.... by G Mazzucchi (557358)

    Published 2013
    “…The reason for such a choice is that the π-flux cubic lattice displays Dirac points and that decreasing the hopping coefficient in a spatial direction (say, <em>t<sub>z</sub></em>), these Dirac points are unaltered: it is then possible to study the 3D–2D interpolation towards the π-flux square lattice. …”
  12. 2052
  13. 2053
  14. 2054

    K305A point mutation in SNX27b RA domain disrupts interaction with constitutively active H-Ras (H-Ras<sub>G12V</sub>CA). by Bartosz Balana (394188)

    Published 2013
    “…<b>C</b>, Quantification of pull-down shows consistent decrease in association of GST-RA<sub>K305A</sub> mutant with His<sub>8</sub>-Ras<sub>G12V</sub>CA (assay repeated 4 times).…”
  15. 2055
  16. 2056
  17. 2057

    List of Included studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  18. 2058

    The search strategy in three databases. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  19. 2059

    NIH score. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  20. 2060

    List of excluded studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”