Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search)
-
2041
-
2042
-
2043
-
2044
-
2045
Changes in neural activity were decreased in animals pre-exposed to 5-HT and <i>mod-1</i> mutants when the worms switched their locomotive direction.
Published 2019“…<p>(A–F) the neural activity of the RID changes during the transition periods from backward to forward locomotion (A–C) and from forward to backward locomotion (D–F) in the mock (A: p = 1.5 × 10<sup>−5</sup>; D: p = 5.5 × 10<sup>−13</sup>), 5-HT exposed (B: p = 0.092; E: p = 0.79), and <i>mod-1</i> mutant (C: p = 0.081; F: p = 0.93) groups. …”
-
2046
<i>Ext1</i> mutant lungs exhibit a decrease in SHH-FGF10 signaling.
Published 2017“…<p>(A) qPCR analysis of key components of FGF signaling pathway in lungs from E14.5. …”
-
2047
-
2048
Excel data file with all collected data.
Published 2025“…SD = 11.6) after the last day of treatment. 25% (n = 5) met the response criteria, with a mean time to response of 2.2 days (min = 1, max = 3. …”
-
2049
-
2050
-
2051
Gap Δ versus <em>U</em> for different values of the anisotropy parameter <em>a</em> for the π-flux cubic lattice model at half-filling (from top to bottom, <em>a</em> = 0, 0.05, 0....
Published 2013“…The reason for such a choice is that the π-flux cubic lattice displays Dirac points and that decreasing the hopping coefficient in a spatial direction (say, <em>t<sub>z</sub></em>), these Dirac points are unaltered: it is then possible to study the 3D–2D interpolation towards the π-flux square lattice. …”
-
2052
-
2053
-
2054
K305A point mutation in SNX27b RA domain disrupts interaction with constitutively active H-Ras (H-Ras<sub>G12V</sub>CA).
Published 2013“…<b>C</b>, Quantification of pull-down shows consistent decrease in association of GST-RA<sub>K305A</sub> mutant with His<sub>8</sub>-Ras<sub>G12V</sub>CA (assay repeated 4 times).…”
-
2055
-
2056
-
2057
List of Included studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
2058
The search strategy in three databases.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
2059
NIH score.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
2060
List of excluded studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”