Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a step » _ step (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a step » _ step (Expand Search)
-
1861
Step length asymmetry and step width during split-belt adaptation.
Published 2025“…<p>A) Step length asymmetry timeseries during the split-belt walking between the control (Control – red), true information about task duration (True – green), and false information of task duration (False – blue) groups. …”
-
1862
-
1863
-
1864
-
1865
Regression analysis of step length and step duration modulators with effects on speed.
Published 2021“…<p>The stretch reflex gain of iliopsoas during pre-swing and the length offset during swing have a decreasing impact on speed due to decreasing step length and increasing step duration for the former and primarily for step duration increasing for the latter. …”
-
1866
The RehaGait® system.
Published 2025“…Gait variables were: stride length, stride duration, velocity, cadence, variability, stance, swing, single support, double support, step height, hip, knee and ankle joint angles.</p><p>Results</p><p>Compared to HI, the main differences in the gait variables were: decreased stride length (p < 0.01), velocity (p < 0.01), swing time (p < 0.01), single support (p < 0.01), hip flexion (p < 0.01), heel strike angle (p < 0.01) and toe-off angle (p < 0.01). …”
-
1867
Flow chart of included patients and dropouts.
Published 2025“…Gait variables were: stride length, stride duration, velocity, cadence, variability, stance, swing, single support, double support, step height, hip, knee and ankle joint angles.</p><p>Results</p><p>Compared to HI, the main differences in the gait variables were: decreased stride length (p < 0.01), velocity (p < 0.01), swing time (p < 0.01), single support (p < 0.01), hip flexion (p < 0.01), heel strike angle (p < 0.01) and toe-off angle (p < 0.01). …”
-
1868
Dataset of the analyzed data.
Published 2025“…Gait variables were: stride length, stride duration, velocity, cadence, variability, stance, swing, single support, double support, step height, hip, knee and ankle joint angles.</p><p>Results</p><p>Compared to HI, the main differences in the gait variables were: decreased stride length (p < 0.01), velocity (p < 0.01), swing time (p < 0.01), single support (p < 0.01), hip flexion (p < 0.01), heel strike angle (p < 0.01) and toe-off angle (p < 0.01). …”
-
1869
-
1870
-
1871
-
1872
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 185.6, <i>p</i> = 4.8 × 10<sup>−42</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 10.37, <i>p</i> = 9.3 × 10<sup>−21</sup>, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), condition F = 174, <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−39</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 12.7, <i>p</i> = 2 × 10<sup>−26</sup>, post hoc for each level baseline versus repetitive stress <i>p</i> < 0.01 for all levels above 50 dB, all Bonferroni corrected). …”
-
1873
-
1874
-
1875
-
1876
-
1877
-
1878
-
1879
Increase in the diffusion rate leads to a decrease in spike number.
Published 2019“…<p>In all domains, an increase in diffusion of either the activator (<i>D</i><sub><i>A</i></sub>, top two rows) or the inhibitor (<i>D</i><sub><i>H</i></sub>, bottom two rows) leads to a decrease in the number of spikes. …”
-
1880