Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a step » _ step (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a step » _ step (Expand Search)
-
40281
-
40282
-
40283
-
40284
-
40285
Landscape vulnerability index.
Published 2023“…Results manifest that: (1) Overall, from 2005 to 2021, its spatial distribution features of landscape ecological risk level are relatively-high and high in the middle, and gradually reduce in the north-south direction, as shown below: the relatively-low ecological risk areas are widely spread, and the overall risk index decrease from 0.1944 to 0.1940; the area of low and high-level ecological risk areas show a decreasing trend, which decrease by 5.0102 km<sup>2</sup> and 1.3132 km<sup>2</sup> respectively; the area of relatively-low, middle, and relatively-high-level ecological risk areas increase by 0.2655 km<sup>2</sup>, 3.7803 km<sup>2</sup>, and 2.4852 km<sup>2</sup>, respectively. (2) The ecological risk value is correlated positively with spatial distribution, and the spatial aggregation forms are primarily low-low and high-high. (3) The ecological risk values in Engebei have a significant spatial correlation, and the spatial distribution shows a clustering effect, which is consistent with the spatial distribution. …”
-
40286
Ecological risk classification.
Published 2023“…Results manifest that: (1) Overall, from 2005 to 2021, its spatial distribution features of landscape ecological risk level are relatively-high and high in the middle, and gradually reduce in the north-south direction, as shown below: the relatively-low ecological risk areas are widely spread, and the overall risk index decrease from 0.1944 to 0.1940; the area of low and high-level ecological risk areas show a decreasing trend, which decrease by 5.0102 km<sup>2</sup> and 1.3132 km<sup>2</sup> respectively; the area of relatively-low, middle, and relatively-high-level ecological risk areas increase by 0.2655 km<sup>2</sup>, 3.7803 km<sup>2</sup>, and 2.4852 km<sup>2</sup>, respectively. (2) The ecological risk value is correlated positively with spatial distribution, and the spatial aggregation forms are primarily low-low and high-high. (3) The ecological risk values in Engebei have a significant spatial correlation, and the spatial distribution shows a clustering effect, which is consistent with the spatial distribution. …”
-
40287
-
40288
-
40289
-
40290
-
40291
-
40292
-
40293
All experimental data from this study.
Published 2023“…A bis-indole derivative, MMV1593539, decreased spore viability. …”
-
40294
-
40295
-
40296
-
40297
-
40298
Dead <i>E</i>. <i>coli</i> or <i>S</i>. <i>aureus</i> feeding for one week did not induce Reg3β or RELMβ protein expression of the intestinal mucosa in germ-free mice.
Published 2017“…<p>Germ free mice demonstrated a significant decrease of Reg3β and RELMβ protein expression of the intestinal mucosa as compared with those in SPF mice. ***, <i>P</i>< 0.001. n = 5/group.…”
-
40299
-
40300
CaMKII regulates GKAP clustering, but does not prevent Aβ-induced GKAP degradation.
Published 2011“…Both CaMKII Inhibitor-I and Autocamtide alone decreased GKAP cluster size (64.1±8.3% and 66.5±5.7% of baseline, respectively) but did not prevent a further decrease after Aβ treatment (67.4±8.3% CaMKII inhib+Aβ vs CaMKII alone; 76.4±6.6% Autocamtide+Aβ vs Autocamtide alone). …”