Showing 1,121 - 1,140 results of 31,825 for search '(( a step decrease ) OR ( 50 ((((ms decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (nn decrease)) ))', query time: 0.96s Refine Results
  1. 1121
  2. 1122
  3. 1123
  4. 1124
  5. 1125
  6. 1126
  7. 1127

    Stability scores with refinement, no USM decreases, no W. by Jedediah M. Singer (10331212)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>Effects of guided and random substitutions within GM designs with a maximum sequence identity to any expert-designed protein of less than 50%, when guided substitutions are not permitted to decrease USM EC<sub>50</sub> predictions and neither guided nor random substitutions are allowed to change amino acids to tryptophan.…”
  8. 1128
  9. 1129

    Stability scores with refinement, no USM decreases, no AFILMVWY. by Jedediah M. Singer (10331212)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>Effects of guided and random substitutions within GM designs with a maximum sequence identity to any expert-designed protein of less than 50%, when guided substitutions are not permitted to decrease USM EC<sub>50</sub> predictions and neither guided nor random substitutions are allowed to change amino acids to alanine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, valine, tryptophan, or tyrosine.…”
  10. 1130
  11. 1131
  12. 1132
  13. 1133
  14. 1134
  15. 1135
  16. 1136

    S1 File - by Chantelle M. de Vet (16535257)

    Published 2024
    “…The student’s RV-GLS consistency was poor during the first 25 measurements, moderate-to good during the second 25 measurements and again poor-to-moderate during the final 50 measurements. Repeated measurements analysis showed a significant decrease in variability of the LV- and RV-GLS score differences between the expert and trainees over time (<i>p</i><sub>adj</sub><0.001), which was not significantly different between trainees. …”
  17. 1137
  18. 1138
  19. 1139
  20. 1140

    GLS analysis with 2D-STE software. by Chantelle M. de Vet (16535257)

    Published 2024
    “…The student’s RV-GLS consistency was poor during the first 25 measurements, moderate-to good during the second 25 measurements and again poor-to-moderate during the final 50 measurements. Repeated measurements analysis showed a significant decrease in variability of the LV- and RV-GLS score differences between the expert and trainees over time (<i>p</i><sub>adj</sub><0.001), which was not significantly different between trainees. …”