Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a step » _ step (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a step » _ step (Expand Search)
-
7101
-
7102
-
7103
-
7104
-
7105
The association of diabetic retinopathy with metabolic syndrome.
Published 2016“…When patients were grouped according to the number of detected components of the metabolic syndrome, the percentage of patients with DR increased linearly with the increasing number of components in their respective groups (14.3%, 38.9%, 49.1%, 61.4%, 83.3%, respectively), whereas, the percentage of patients without DR decreased with the increasing number of components (85.7%, 61.1%, 50.9%, 38.6%, 16.7%, respectively) (Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> = 9.938, P = 0.037). …”
-
7106
-
7107
Intervention effect regarding eye product AMU.
Published 2023“…The intervention effect was modelled using a step function with a change in (linear) time trend and clinic characteristics, as potential determinants of topical AMU, were assessed using a multivariable regression model. …”
-
7108
Intervention effect regarding skin product AMU.
Published 2023“…The intervention effect was modelled using a step function with a change in (linear) time trend and clinic characteristics, as potential determinants of topical AMU, were assessed using a multivariable regression model. …”
-
7109
Intervention effect regarding ear product AMU.
Published 2023“…The intervention effect was modelled using a step function with a change in (linear) time trend and clinic characteristics, as potential determinants of topical AMU, were assessed using a multivariable regression model. …”
-
7110
-
7111
Tun impairs alveolarization in NOX neonatal rat lungs.
Published 2022“…The decreased radial alveolar counts (RAC; 2.9±0.5 <i>vs</i> 4.8±0.7, n = 11, 5 males and 5 females each group, p<0.001) (<b>A</b>), increased mean linear intercepts (MLI; 77.8±6.8 μm <i>v</i>.…”
-
7112
-
7113
Scores of each variable in the main components.
Published 2023“…Stellate sturgeon (<i>Acipenser stellatus</i>) fry, was exposed to diazinon (25, 50, and 75% of 96h-LC<sub>50</sub>) for 6 days after pre-treatment with an HSP inducer (HSPi), TEX-OE<sup>®</sup> (a prickly pear cactus extract), for 4 hours. …”
-
7114
-
7115
-
7116
Smoking impact on fibrosis and cancer gene expression.
Published 2017“…Even at this low magnification the increased dysplasia of the bronchial lining is visible (asterisks). Bar = 50 microns. B. Plots show the relative expression of selected pro-fibrotic genes in the α7<sup>G</sup> or the α7<sup>E260A:G</sup> and the relative impact of either LPS (from [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0187773#pone.0187773.ref007" target="_blank">7</a>]) or CS (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0187773#pone.0187773.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>). …”
-
7117
Changes to distal lung structure of both α7 genotypes with and without CS exposure.
Published 2017“…In these representative sections the arrows point to AMs and in the α7<sup>E260A:G</sup> arrow heads identify regions of increased cellularity that produce alveolar sacs of decreased size. …”
-
7118
-
7119
Fig 1 -
Published 2023“…<p>Top 50 drugs with (A) greatest percentage increase and (B) greatest percentage decrease in average spending per beneficiary between 2014 and 2020.…”
-
7120
Fig 3 -
Published 2023“…<p>Percentage change in beneficiaries for the top 50 drugs with (A) greatest increase and (B) greatest decrease in average spending per beneficiary between 2014 and 2020.…”