Search alternatives:
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
web decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a web » _ web (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
web decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a web » _ web (Expand Search)
-
301
Table 2_Bibliometric analysis of global research on the clinical applications of aminoglycoside antibiotics: improving efficacy and decreasing risk.docx
Published 2025“…AGs have played a significant role in clinical practice in recent years.…”
-
302
Table 1_Bibliometric analysis of global research on the clinical applications of aminoglycoside antibiotics: improving efficacy and decreasing risk.docx
Published 2025“…AGs have played a significant role in clinical practice in recent years.…”
-
303
-
304
-
305
-
306
-
307
-
308
-
309
-
310
-
311
-
312
Model food web mean path length and dominant eigenvalue as a function of nominal size and connectance.
Published 2015“…In (b) and (d), both mean path length and dominant eigenvalue increase with web size. Together, these relationships largely account for the patterns in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0137829#pone.0137829.g002" target="_blank">Fig 2</a>. …”
-
313
-
314
2-CDA decreases PIN 1 protein levels in 7WD10 cells.
Published 2013“…(B) ImageJ quantitation revealed significantly decreased PIN 1 protein levels at 0.1 mM (39%, p<0.001), at 0.5 µM (30%, p<0.001), 1.0 µM (24%, p<0.001), 5.0 µM (19%, p<0.001) and 10.0 µM (29%, p<0.001) compared to untreated control cells n = 4 in each group. *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, vs. untreated controls.…”
-
315
-
316
-
317
-
318
-
319
-
320