Showing 101 - 120 results of 102,718 for search '(( a web decrease ) OR ( 5 ((((we decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 1.58s Refine Results
  1. 101
  2. 102
  3. 103
  4. 104
  5. 105
  6. 106

    The Prognostic Value of Decreased LKB1 in Solid Tumors: A Meta-Analysis by Jian Xiao (253329)

    Published 2016
    “…Additionally, the pooled odds ratios (ORs) indicated that decreased LKB1 was associated with larger tumor size (OR: 1.60, 95%CI: 1.09–2.36, P = 0.017), lymph node metastasis (OR: 2.41, 95%CI: 1.53–3.78, P<0.001) and a higher TNM stage (OR: 3.35, 95%CI: 2.20–5.09, P<0.001).…”
  7. 107
  8. 108
  9. 109
  10. 110
  11. 111
  12. 112
  13. 113
  14. 114
  15. 115

    Decreased innervation and decreased epidermal thickness in STZ diabetic rats. by Shoista Kambiz (740608)

    Published 2015
    “…<p>Decreased density PGP9.5-IR nerve fibers (<b>A</b>) and average epidermal thickness (<b>F</b>) was demonstrated in the plantar skin of diabetic animals 4, 6, and 8 weeks after induction of diabetes (black bars) when compared to control (white bar). …”
  16. 116
  17. 117

    Supplementary Material for: Longitudinal Decrease in Left Ventricular Size with Age: Impact on Mortality and Cardiovascular Hospitalization by figshare admin karger (2628495)

    Published 2025
    “…This study investigated clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with longitudinal decreases in LV size in this population. Methods: We analyzed echocardiographic data from 6,232 adults with normal baseline left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), with a mean interval of 4.8 years between baseline and follow-up echocardiograms. …”
  18. 118
  19. 119
  20. 120

    List of Included studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”