Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
Group-level narrow- and broad-band spectral changes after hemispherotomy reveal a marked EEG slowing of the isolated cortex, robust across patients.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> The geometric mean of the PSD was taken first across electrodes, and subsequently across patients, for the observed PSD (main graph) as well as for the aperiodic fit of the PSD (corresponding to a straight line under logarithmic scale for both <i>x</i> and <i>y</i> axes, inset graph). …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
<b>Supporting data for manuscript</b> "<b>Voluntary locomotion induces an early and remote hemodynamic decrease in the large cerebral veins</b>"
Published 2025“…<p dir="ltr">The CSV file 'Eyreetal_DrainingVein_SourceData' contains the averaged time series traces and extracted metrics from individual experiments used across Figures 1-5 in the manuscript "Voluntary locomotion induces an early and remote hemodynamic decrease in the large cerebral veins". …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
10
-
11
PBP1 depletion results in a population of cells with decreased RADA fluorescence.
Published 2025“…Note that the P<sub>tet</sub>-<i>gusA</i> data from panel A (blue squares) was duplicated in panel B for comparison. >1300 cells were quantified across three independent experiments, and symbols represent the mean and standard error of the mean from three replicates.…”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Modelled policy outcomes, with posterior values for individual nodes ranked from 1-5 across the parties - Green, Reform UK, Liberal Democrat, Conservative, and Labour, where 1 is the lowest rank and 5 is the highest. The parties are ranked for each policy node in the network (e.g., income tax), based on the direction of change (“performance indicator”) stated in the first column (e.g., lowest, highest, most, improvement). For example, a value of 5 for Green tax means that green tax is lowest under Reform UK’s policies, while a value of 1 means that green tax is highest under the Green Party’s policies. Larger text in bold and italic font indicates that the directional change (i.e., increase or decrease) of a node under a party’s policies is consistent with the direction indicated, whereas black text indicates an opposite directional change (e.g., income tax is predicted to decrease under Reform UK in alignment with the performance indicator, and increase under Green and Labour).
Published 2025“…Larger text in bold and italic font indicates that the directional change (i.e., increase or decrease) of a node under a party’s policies is consistent with the direction indicated, whereas black text indicates an opposite directional change (e.g., income tax is predicted to decrease under Reform UK in alignment with the performance indicator, and increase under Green and Labour).…”
-
18
-
19
-
20