Search alternatives:
algorithm both » algorithm blood (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search), algorithm etc (Expand Search)
both function » body function (Expand Search), growth function (Expand Search), beach function (Expand Search)
algorithm seu » algorithm setup (Expand Search), algorithm used (Expand Search), algorithm based (Expand Search)
seu function » relu function (Expand Search), cep function (Expand Search), islet function (Expand Search)
algorithm both » algorithm blood (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search), algorithm etc (Expand Search)
both function » body function (Expand Search), growth function (Expand Search), beach function (Expand Search)
algorithm seu » algorithm setup (Expand Search), algorithm used (Expand Search), algorithm based (Expand Search)
seu function » relu function (Expand Search), cep function (Expand Search), islet function (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Continuous Probability Distributions generated by the PIPE Algorithm
Published 2022“…<div><p>Abstract We investigate the use of the Probabilistic Incremental Programming Evolution (PIPE) algorithm as a tool to construct continuous cumulative distribution functions to model given data sets. …”
-
6
Efficient Algorithms for GPU Accelerated Evaluation of the DFT Exchange-Correlation Functional
Published 2025“…Kohn–Sham density functional theory (KS-DFT) has become a cornerstone for studying the electronic structure of molecules and materials. …”
-
7
The pseudocode for the NAFPSO algorithm.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
8
PSO algorithm flowchart.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
9
Prediction performance of different optimization algorithms.
Published 2021“…<p>(A) 3 algorithms were compared in terms of the residuals of the cost function of the optimized TF on 7 mice datasets (Derivative free algorithm failed in optimizing a TF in a mouse). …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Algorithm of the brightness scale calibration experiment.
Published 2024“…<p>In the algorithm, the following variables were used: “I” denotes the current luminous intensity of the reference diode, “inc” denotes the current difference between reference and target diode luminous intensity; “cnt” is the current number of performed trials, while “correct” is a counter of correct answers in cnt trials, both of them are counted separately for every settings of I and inc. …”
-
16
-
17
Scheduling time of five algorithms.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
18
Convergence speed of five algorithms.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
19
-
20