Search alternatives:
algorithm python » algorithm within (Expand Search), algorithms within (Expand Search), algorithm both (Expand Search)
algorithm brain » algorithm ai (Expand Search), algorithm against (Expand Search), algorithm within (Expand Search)
python function » protein function (Expand Search)
brain function » barrier function (Expand Search), protein function (Expand Search)
algorithm a » algorithms a (Expand Search), algorithm _ (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search)
a function » _ function (Expand Search)
algorithm python » algorithm within (Expand Search), algorithms within (Expand Search), algorithm both (Expand Search)
algorithm brain » algorithm ai (Expand Search), algorithm against (Expand Search), algorithm within (Expand Search)
python function » protein function (Expand Search)
brain function » barrier function (Expand Search), protein function (Expand Search)
algorithm a » algorithms a (Expand Search), algorithm _ (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search)
a function » _ function (Expand Search)
-
581
-
582
-
583
-
584
-
585
-
586
Test results of multimodal benchmark functions.
Published 2025“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
587
Fixed-dimensional multimodal reference functions.
Published 2025“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
588
Test results of multimodal benchmark functions.
Published 2025“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
589
Fitness function over the 50 runs.
Published 2025“…Results reveal that ZOA outperformed other algorithms, supplying electricity at a minimum cost of 0.1285 $/kWh in one configuration, with the LFP battery achieving the lowest NPC of 3.8 M$ in case studies with constrained LPSP. …”
-
590
Fitness function over the 50 runs.
Published 2025“…Results reveal that ZOA outperformed other algorithms, supplying electricity at a minimum cost of 0.1285 $/kWh in one configuration, with the LFP battery achieving the lowest NPC of 3.8 M$ in case studies with constrained LPSP. …”
-
591
Fitness function over the 50 runs.
Published 2025“…Results reveal that ZOA outperformed other algorithms, supplying electricity at a minimum cost of 0.1285 $/kWh in one configuration, with the LFP battery achieving the lowest NPC of 3.8 M$ in case studies with constrained LPSP. …”
-
592
S- and V-Type transfer function diagrams.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
593
-
594
-
595
-
596
-
597
-
598
-
599
-
600