WGCNA and machine learning algorithms. by Shushu Wang (6870191)

Efficient Algorithms for GPU Accelerated Evaluation of the DFT Exchange-Correlation Functional by Ryan Stocks (16867476)

“…Improving algorithmic efficiency through hardware-aware implementations enables application to larger systems and more efficient generation of larger training data sets for machine-learning. …”

Integration of three machine learning algorithms to characterize lipid metabolism-associated hub genes in sepsis and atrial fibrillation. by Changze Ou (22806374)

Search for Correlations Between the Results of the Density Functional Theory and Hartree–Fock Calculations Using Neural Networks and Classical Machine Learning Algorithms by Saadiallakh Normatov (20682324)

Search for Correlations Between the Results of the Density Functional Theory and Hartree–Fock Calculations Using Neural Networks and Classical Machine Learning Algorithms by Saadiallakh Normatov (20682324)

Run times of two algorithms. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

Subjects:

Images of partial benchmark functions. by ZeSheng Lin (20501356)

Subjects:

IEEE CEC 2017 benchmark function specifications. by Kankan Tang (21474968)

IEEE CEC 2022 benchmark function specifications. by Kankan Tang (21474968)

Statistical results of various algorithms. by ZeSheng Lin (20501356)

Subjects:

Machine learning analysis of 10 hub genes related to SCI was performed using eight algorithms applied to the dataset. by Tianbao Feng (21722233)

Sensor value scenario for fuzzy logic algorithm. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

Subjects:

Multimodal reference functions. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

The convergence curves of the test functions. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Single-peaked reference functions. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Test results of multimodal benchmark functions. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Fixed-dimensional multimodal reference functions. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Test results of multimodal benchmark functions. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Trainable parameters for different algorithms. by Anwar Hossain Efat (19942283)

Performance of ENQUIRE’s gene normalization algorithm. by Luca Musella (19986312)