Search alternatives:
algorithm harding » algorithm using (Expand Search), algorithm machine (Expand Search), algorithm showing (Expand Search)
harding function » hardening function (Expand Search), hearing functions (Expand Search), varying functions (Expand Search)
algorithm python » algorithm within (Expand Search), algorithms within (Expand Search)
algorithm both » algorithm blood (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search), algorithm etc (Expand Search)
algorithm harding » algorithm using (Expand Search), algorithm machine (Expand Search), algorithm showing (Expand Search)
harding function » hardening function (Expand Search), hearing functions (Expand Search), varying functions (Expand Search)
algorithm python » algorithm within (Expand Search), algorithms within (Expand Search)
algorithm both » algorithm blood (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search), algorithm etc (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
The parameters of algorithms.
Published 2025“…However, solving the RNP problem in WMN is difficult because it is NP-hard. As a result, this problem can only be solved using approximate optimization algorithms such as heuristics and meta-heuristics. …”
-
23
-
24
Efficient Algorithms for GPU Accelerated Evaluation of the DFT Exchange-Correlation Functional
Published 2025“…Kohn–Sham density functional theory (KS-DFT) has become a cornerstone for studying the electronic structure of molecules and materials. …”
-
25
-
26
-
27
Cost function calculated by QA with different hyperparameters.
Published 2025Subjects: “…currently available algorithms…”
-
28
Cost function calculated by SA with different hyperparameters.
Published 2025Subjects: “…currently available algorithms…”
-
29
The pseudocode for the NAFPSO algorithm.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
30
PSO algorithm flowchart.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
31
-
32
-
33
Comparison of different algorithms.
Published 2025“…A sophisticated optimization model has been developed to simulate the optimal operation of machinery, aiming to maximize equipment utilization efficiency while addressing the challenges posed by worker fatigue. An innovative algorithm, the improved hybrid gray wolf and whale algorithm fused with a penalty function for construction machinery optimization (IHWGWO), is introduced, incorporating a penalty function to handle constraints effectively. …”
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
Study proposed algorithm.
Published 2025“…The index of microvascular resistance (IMR) is a specific physiological parameter used to assess microvascular function. Invasive coronary assessment has been shown to be both feasible and safe. …”
-
38
Gillespie algorithm simulation parameters.
Published 2024“…Both the ensemble and stochastic models presented in this work have been verified using Monte Carlo molecular dynamic simulations that utilize the Gillespie algorithm. …”
-
39
Scheduling time of five algorithms.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
40
Convergence speed of five algorithms.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”