Showing 1 - 20 results of 6,334 for search '(( algorithm harding function ) OR ( algorithm which function ))', query time: 0.50s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2

    Efficient algorithms to discover alterations with complementary functional association in cancer by Rebecca Sarto Basso (6728921)

    Published 2019
    “…We provide analytic evidence of the effectiveness of UNCOVER in finding high-quality solutions and show experimentally that UNCOVER finds sets of alterations significantly associated with functional targets in a variety of scenarios. In particular, we show that our algorithms find sets which are better than the ones obtained by the state-of-the-art method, even when sets are evaluated using the statistical score employed by the latter. …”
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    500 <i>ϕ</i> vectors learned from hard thresholding. by Ilias Rentzeperis (10215602)

    Published 2023
    “…Traditionally, to replicate such biological sparsity, generative models have been using the <i>ℓ</i><sub>1</sub> norm as a penalty due to its convexity, which makes it amenable to fast and simple algorithmic solvers. …”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Using synthetic data to test group-searching algorithms in a context where the correct grouping of species is known and uniquely defined. by Yuanchen Zhao (12905580)

    Published 2024
    “…(C) We use the synthetic data as input for three families of regression-based algorithms: the EQO of Ref. [<a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012590#pcbi.1012590.ref026" target="_blank">26</a>] (which groups species into two groups), and two families we call K-means and Metropolis (see text), which can return any specified number of groups. …”
  19. 19

    Fitness function curve at weight factor 0.3. by Dhulfiqar Hakeem Dhayef (17729684)

    Published 2024
    “…GA is employed to identify machine cells and part families based on Grouping Efficiency (GE) as a fitness function. In contrast to previous research, which considered grouping efficiency with a weight factor (<i>q</i> = 0.5), this study utilizes various weight factor values (0.1, 0.3, 0.7, 0.5, and 0.9). …”
  20. 20