Search alternatives:
within function » fibrin function (Expand Search), python function (Expand Search), protein function (Expand Search)
algorithm i » algorithm _ (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search), algorithm a (Expand Search)
algorithm l » algorithm cl (Expand Search), algorithm _ (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search)
i function » _ function (Expand Search), a function (Expand Search), 1 function (Expand Search)
l function » _ function (Expand Search), a function (Expand Search), 1 function (Expand Search)
within function » fibrin function (Expand Search), python function (Expand Search), protein function (Expand Search)
algorithm i » algorithm _ (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search), algorithm a (Expand Search)
algorithm l » algorithm cl (Expand Search), algorithm _ (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search)
i function » _ function (Expand Search), a function (Expand Search), 1 function (Expand Search)
l function » _ function (Expand Search), a function (Expand Search), 1 function (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Algorithmic assessment reveals functional implications of GABRD gene variants linked to idiopathic generalized epilepsy
Published 2024“…</p> <p>The study identifies specific variants (L111R, R114C, D123N, G150S, and L243P) in the coding region of the GABRD gene, which are predicted as deleterious by multiple algorithms. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Multimodal reference functions.
Published 2025“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
8
Algorithm for generating virtual patients.
Published 2021“…<b>2)</b> The model evaluated is then simulated on this parameter set to obtain <i>y</i>(<i>t</i>, <i>p</i>). <b>3)</b> A simulated annealing algorithm is then used to determine a parameter set that optimises the objective function <i>J</i>(<i>p</i>) (<a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009753#ppat.1009753.e059" target="_blank">Eq 17</a>). …”
-
9
The convergence curves of the test functions.
Published 2025“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
10
Single-peaked reference functions.
Published 2025“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
11
Predictive Mixing for Density Functional Theory (and Other Fixed-Point Problems)
Published 2021“…Density functional theory calculations use a significant fraction of current supercomputing time. …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
Test results of multimodal benchmark functions.
Published 2025“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
15
Fixed-dimensional multimodal reference functions.
Published 2025“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
16
Test results of multimodal benchmark functions.
Published 2025“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Training test results of different algorithms on natural scene exposure dataset.
Published 2024Subjects: