يعرض 941 - 960 نتائج من 1,747 نتيجة بحث عن '(( algorithm low functional ) OR ((( algorithm python function ) OR ( algorithm both function ))))', وقت الاستعلام: 0.42s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 941
  2. 942

    Wilcoxon test results for feature selection. حسب Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

    منشور في 2025
    "…We applied this hybrid strategy to a Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN), and validated its performance improvements through extensive experiments, including ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests for both feature selection and optimization phases. …"
  3. 943

    Feature selection metrics and their definitions. حسب Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

    منشور في 2025
    "…We applied this hybrid strategy to a Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN), and validated its performance improvements through extensive experiments, including ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests for both feature selection and optimization phases. …"
  4. 944

    Statistical summary of all models. حسب Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

    منشور في 2025
    "…We applied this hybrid strategy to a Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN), and validated its performance improvements through extensive experiments, including ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests for both feature selection and optimization phases. …"
  5. 945

    Classification performance after optimization. حسب Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

    منشور في 2025
    "…We applied this hybrid strategy to a Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN), and validated its performance improvements through extensive experiments, including ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests for both feature selection and optimization phases. …"
  6. 946

    ANOVA test for optimization results. حسب Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

    منشور في 2025
    "…We applied this hybrid strategy to a Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN), and validated its performance improvements through extensive experiments, including ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests for both feature selection and optimization phases. …"
  7. 947

    Feature selection results. حسب Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

    منشور في 2025
    "…We applied this hybrid strategy to a Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN), and validated its performance improvements through extensive experiments, including ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests for both feature selection and optimization phases. …"
  8. 948

    ANOVA test for feature selection. حسب Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

    منشور في 2025
    "…We applied this hybrid strategy to a Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN), and validated its performance improvements through extensive experiments, including ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests for both feature selection and optimization phases. …"
  9. 949

    Wilcoxon test results for optimization. حسب Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

    منشور في 2025
    "…We applied this hybrid strategy to a Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN), and validated its performance improvements through extensive experiments, including ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests for both feature selection and optimization phases. …"
  10. 950

    Classification performance of ML and DL models. حسب Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

    منشور في 2025
    "…We applied this hybrid strategy to a Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN), and validated its performance improvements through extensive experiments, including ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests for both feature selection and optimization phases. …"
  11. 951

    Skipping frames and interpolating skeletons with a spline achieves similar accuracy and faster computational time. حسب Weheliye H. Weheliye (22022140)

    منشور في 2025
    "…(C) Computation time per input frame for the different models as a function of worm number. Tierpsy only uses CPU computation while Omnipose uses GPU and CPU because we use Tierpsy’s skeletonization algorithm to convert segmented regions to skeletons. …"
  12. 952

    PhyCysID: Plant Cystatin Protein Prediction by an Artificial Intelligence Approach حسب Sadaf Aqil (22183571)

    منشور في 2025
    "…As a case study, a curated dataset of phytocystatin sequences from the UniProt database was used to evaluate the algorithm’s performance. The PhyCysID web server enables rapid classification of both individual and batch-submitted sequences in less than 15 s, providing high-throughput analysis for an accurate identification of phytocystatin class and function. …"
  13. 953

    PhyCysID: Plant Cystatin Protein Prediction by an Artificial Intelligence Approach حسب Sadaf Aqil (22183571)

    منشور في 2025
    "…As a case study, a curated dataset of phytocystatin sequences from the UniProt database was used to evaluate the algorithm’s performance. The PhyCysID web server enables rapid classification of both individual and batch-submitted sequences in less than 15 s, providing high-throughput analysis for an accurate identification of phytocystatin class and function. …"
  14. 954

    PhyCysID: Plant Cystatin Protein Prediction by an Artificial Intelligence Approach حسب Sadaf Aqil (22183571)

    منشور في 2025
    "…As a case study, a curated dataset of phytocystatin sequences from the UniProt database was used to evaluate the algorithm’s performance. The PhyCysID web server enables rapid classification of both individual and batch-submitted sequences in less than 15 s, providing high-throughput analysis for an accurate identification of phytocystatin class and function. …"
  15. 955

    PhyCysID: Plant Cystatin Protein Prediction by an Artificial Intelligence Approach حسب Sadaf Aqil (22183571)

    منشور في 2025
    "…As a case study, a curated dataset of phytocystatin sequences from the UniProt database was used to evaluate the algorithm’s performance. The PhyCysID web server enables rapid classification of both individual and batch-submitted sequences in less than 15 s, providing high-throughput analysis for an accurate identification of phytocystatin class and function. …"
  16. 956

    Structure and parameters of pipeline network. حسب Huichao Guo (14515171)

    منشور في 2025
    "…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …"
  17. 957

    Experimental parameter combinations. حسب Huichao Guo (14515171)

    منشور في 2025
    "…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …"
  18. 958

    Experimental results. حسب Huichao Guo (14515171)

    منشور في 2025
    "…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …"
  19. 959

    Data sources for figures and tables. حسب Huichao Guo (14515171)

    منشور في 2025
    "…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …"
  20. 960

    Fault events. حسب Huichao Guo (14515171)

    منشور في 2025
    "…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …"