Search alternatives:
algorithm machine » algorithm achieves (Expand Search), algorithm within (Expand Search)
machine function » achieve functions (Expand Search), sine function (Expand Search)
api function » a function (Expand Search), adl function (Expand Search), gi function (Expand Search)
i function » _ function (Expand Search), a function (Expand Search), link function (Expand Search)
algorithm machine » algorithm achieves (Expand Search), algorithm within (Expand Search)
machine function » achieve functions (Expand Search), sine function (Expand Search)
api function » a function (Expand Search), adl function (Expand Search), gi function (Expand Search)
i function » _ function (Expand Search), a function (Expand Search), link function (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Construction of the PRG score index using integrated machine learning algorithms.
Published 2025Subjects: -
3
-
4
Efficient Algorithms for GPU Accelerated Evaluation of the DFT Exchange-Correlation Functional
Published 2025“…Improving algorithmic efficiency through hardware-aware implementations enables application to larger systems and more efficient generation of larger training data sets for machine-learning. …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
The structure of genetic algorithm (GA).
Published 2024“…Then, radial basis functions (RBFNNs), multilayer perceptron (MLPNNs), hybrid genetic algorithm (GA-NNs), and particle swarm optimization (PSO-NNs) neural networks were utilized to develop PTFs and compared their accuracy with the traditional regression model (MLR) using statistical indices. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Distribution of cross correlations in functional connectivity in ABIDE sample.
Published 2024Subjects: -
18
Cost function calculated by QA with different hyperparameters.
Published 2025Subjects: “…currently available algorithms…”
-
19
Cost function calculated by SA with different hyperparameters.
Published 2025Subjects: “…currently available algorithms…”
-
20
Multimodal reference functions.
Published 2025“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”