Search alternatives:
algorithm machine » algorithm achieves (Expand Search), algorithm within (Expand Search)
machine function » achieve functions (Expand Search), sine function (Expand Search)
algorithm gene » algorithm where (Expand Search), algorithm etc (Expand Search), algorithm pre (Expand Search)
algorithm machine » algorithm achieves (Expand Search), algorithm within (Expand Search)
machine function » achieve functions (Expand Search), sine function (Expand Search)
algorithm gene » algorithm where (Expand Search), algorithm etc (Expand Search), algorithm pre (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Construction of the PRG score index using integrated machine learning algorithms.
Published 2025Subjects: -
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
The gene set related to the “Cytotoxicity” and “Progenitor exhaustion” function of T cells.
Published 2025Subjects: -
15
Multimodal reference functions.
Published 2025“…Notably, the F1-scores, which balance precision and recall, were 0.69 for miRNA expression, 0.65 for gene expression, and 0.62 for DNA methylation. This research not only advances the application of machine learning in medical prognosis but also offers crucial guidance for clinicians in developing more precise and reliable prognostic tools for cancer patients. …”
-
16
The convergence curves of the test functions.
Published 2025“…Notably, the F1-scores, which balance precision and recall, were 0.69 for miRNA expression, 0.65 for gene expression, and 0.62 for DNA methylation. This research not only advances the application of machine learning in medical prognosis but also offers crucial guidance for clinicians in developing more precise and reliable prognostic tools for cancer patients. …”
-
17
Single-peaked reference functions.
Published 2025“…Notably, the F1-scores, which balance precision and recall, were 0.69 for miRNA expression, 0.65 for gene expression, and 0.62 for DNA methylation. This research not only advances the application of machine learning in medical prognosis but also offers crucial guidance for clinicians in developing more precise and reliable prognostic tools for cancer patients. …”
-
18
-
19
Test results of multimodal benchmark functions.
Published 2025“…Notably, the F1-scores, which balance precision and recall, were 0.69 for miRNA expression, 0.65 for gene expression, and 0.62 for DNA methylation. This research not only advances the application of machine learning in medical prognosis but also offers crucial guidance for clinicians in developing more precise and reliable prognostic tools for cancer patients. …”
-
20
Fixed-dimensional multimodal reference functions.
Published 2025“…Notably, the F1-scores, which balance precision and recall, were 0.69 for miRNA expression, 0.65 for gene expression, and 0.62 for DNA methylation. This research not only advances the application of machine learning in medical prognosis but also offers crucial guidance for clinicians in developing more precise and reliable prognostic tools for cancer patients. …”