wIRBMO feature selection algorithm improving rate. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Subjects:

Key gene identification based on two machine learning algorithms. by Lijun Guo (605276)

IEEE CEC 2017 benchmark function specifications. by Kankan Tang (21474968)

IEEE CEC 2022 benchmark function specifications. by Kankan Tang (21474968)

Run times of two algorithms. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

Subjects:

Automatic translation error detection based on fuzzy decision tree algorithm. by Danqiangyu Zhou (22146196)

Subjects:

Integration of three machine learning algorithms to characterize lipid metabolism-associated hub genes in sepsis and atrial fibrillation. by Changze Ou (22806374)

Baseline characteristics of recipients’ comparison before and after data match by the unsupervised machine learning algorithm. by Mahmoudreza Moein (22127153)

Sensor value scenario for fuzzy logic algorithm. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

Subjects:

Sensor value scenario for average value algorithm. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

Subjects:

Multimodal reference functions. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

The convergence curves of the test functions. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Single-peaked reference functions. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Water consumption due to average value and fuzzy logic algorithm. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

Subjects:

Crop yield prediction accuracy using different ML algorithms. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

Subjects:

Test results of multimodal benchmark functions. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Fixed-dimensional multimodal reference functions. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Test results of multimodal benchmark functions. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Different mathematical formalization of model fairness. TPR: True Positive Rate; FPR: False Positive Rate; FNR: False Negative Rate; TNR: True Negative Rate; PPV: Positive Predicti... by Marine Hoche (20896647)

Infrared Spectroscopy Coupled with Machine Learning Algorithms to Investigate Vascular Dysfunction in Ovariectomy: An Animal Model Study by Tháfanys S. Travezani (20609398)