Image 2_Comprehensive analysis of anoikis-related gene signature in ulcerative colitis using machine learning algorithms.tiff by Peng Liu (120506)

“…Key anoikis-DEGs in UC were identified using three machine learning algorithms, including least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression, random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). …”

The structure of genetic algorithm (GA). by Ali Akbar Moosavi (17769033)

“…First, physico-chemical inputs as bulk density (BD), initial water content (W_i), saturated water content (W_s), mean weight diameter (MWD), and geometric mean diameter (GMD) of aggregates, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE) were measured. Then, radial basis functions (RBFNNs), multilayer perceptron (MLPNNs), hybrid genetic algorithm (GA-NNs), and particle swarm optimization (PSO-NNs) neural networks were utilized to develop PTFs and compared their accuracy with the traditional regression model (MLR) using statistical indices. …”

Radar chart of classification accuracy of IRBMO vs. other algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Subjects:

Number of features selected for IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Subjects:

Fitness values of IRBMO vs. other feature selection algorithm. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Subjects:

Classification accuracy values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Subjects:

F-score values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Subjects:

Iterative graph of IRBMO vs. other feature selection algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Subjects:

Data for "A multi-objective platform for autonomous property targeting and optimization of colloidal lead halide perovskite quantum dots" by Neal Munyebvu (19690954)

Optimization Performance Comparison of Metaheuristic Algorithms. by Xie Qiu (13243770)

Comparative experimental ranking results of BWEMFO and other famous optimization methods on IEEE CEC 2017 test functions. by Jingjing Ma (419752)

Subjects:

Anthropometric and functional measurements of the study participants. by Naiara Virto (20490408)

Comparative performance evaluation of 3Mont with other feature selection algorithms over 10 iterations. by Miray Unlu Yazici (14792680)

Subjects:

Table 1_Explainable machine learning reveals ribosome biogenesis biomarkers in preeclampsia risk prediction.xlsx by Jingjing Chen (293564)

“…A multi-algorithm machine learning framework was employed to optimize predictive performance, with model interpretability achieved through SHapley Additive exPlanations and diagnostic accuracy validated by receiver operating characteristic curves. …”

Table 4_Explainable machine learning reveals ribosome biogenesis biomarkers in preeclampsia risk prediction.xlsx by Jingjing Chen (293564)

“…A multi-algorithm machine learning framework was employed to optimize predictive performance, with model interpretability achieved through SHapley Additive exPlanations and diagnostic accuracy validated by receiver operating characteristic curves. …”

Table 5_Explainable machine learning reveals ribosome biogenesis biomarkers in preeclampsia risk prediction.xlsx by Jingjing Chen (293564)

“…A multi-algorithm machine learning framework was employed to optimize predictive performance, with model interpretability achieved through SHapley Additive exPlanations and diagnostic accuracy validated by receiver operating characteristic curves. …”

Table 2_Explainable machine learning reveals ribosome biogenesis biomarkers in preeclampsia risk prediction.xlsx by Jingjing Chen (293564)

“…A multi-algorithm machine learning framework was employed to optimize predictive performance, with model interpretability achieved through SHapley Additive exPlanations and diagnostic accuracy validated by receiver operating characteristic curves. …”

Table 3_Explainable machine learning reveals ribosome biogenesis biomarkers in preeclampsia risk prediction.xlsx by Jingjing Chen (293564)

“…A multi-algorithm machine learning framework was employed to optimize predictive performance, with model interpretability achieved through SHapley Additive exPlanations and diagnostic accuracy validated by receiver operating characteristic curves. …”

Table 6_Predictive prioritization of genes significantly associated with biotic and abiotic stresses in maize using machine learning algorithms.xlsx by Anjan Kumar Pradhan (9386369)

“…A meta-transcriptome approach was undertaken to interrogate 39,756 genes differentially expressed in response to biotic and abiotic stresses in maize were interrogated for prioritization through seven machine learning (ML) models, such as support vector machine (SVM), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), gradient boosting machine (GBM), random forest (RF), naïve bayes (NB), and decision tree (DT) to predict top-most significant genes for stress conditions. …”

Table 7_Predictive prioritization of genes significantly associated with biotic and abiotic stresses in maize using machine learning algorithms.xlsx by Anjan Kumar Pradhan (9386369)

“…A meta-transcriptome approach was undertaken to interrogate 39,756 genes differentially expressed in response to biotic and abiotic stresses in maize were interrogated for prioritization through seven machine learning (ML) models, such as support vector machine (SVM), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), gradient boosting machine (GBM), random forest (RF), naïve bayes (NB), and decision tree (DT) to predict top-most significant genes for stress conditions. …”