Code by Baoqiang Chen (21099509)

“…We implemented machine learning algorithms using the following R packages: rpart for Decision Trees, gbm for Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), ranger for Random Forests, the glm function for Generalized Linear Models (GLM), and xgboost for Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB). …”

Core data by Baoqiang Chen (21099509)

“…We implemented machine learning algorithms using the following R packages: rpart for Decision Trees, gbm for Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), ranger for Random Forests, the glm function for Generalized Linear Models (GLM), and xgboost for Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB). …”

Landscape17 by Vlad Carare (22092515)

“…</p><p dir="ltr">We utilized TopSearch, an open-source Python package, to perform landscape exploration, at an estimated cost of 10⁵CPUh. …”

<b>Rethinking neighbourhood boundaries for urban planning: A data-driven framework for perception-based delineation</b> by Shubham Pawar (22471285)

“…</p><h2>Project Structure</h2><pre><pre>Perception_based_neighbourhoods/<br>├── raw_data/<br>│ ├── ET_cells_glasgow/ # Glasgow grid cells for analysis<br>│ └── glasgow_open_built/ # Built area boundaries<br>├── svi_module/ # Street View Image processing<br>│ ├── svi_data/<br>│ │ ├── svi_info.csv # Image metadata (output)<br>│ │ └── images/ # Downloaded images (output)<br>│ ├── get_svi_data.py # Download street view images<br>│ └── trueskill_score.py # Generate TrueSkill scores<br>├── perception_module/ # Perception prediction<br>│ ├── output_data/<br>│ │ └── glasgow_perception.nc # Perception scores (demo data)<br>│ ├── trained_models/ # Pre-trained models<br>│ ├── pred.py # Predict perceptions from images<br>│ └── readme.md # Training instructions<br>└── cluster_module/ # Neighbourhood clustering<br> ├── output_data/<br> │ └── clusters.shp # Final neighbourhood boundaries<br> └── cluster_perceptions.py # Clustering algorithm<br></pre></pre><h2>Prerequisites</h2><ul><li>Python 3.8 or higher</li><li>GDAL/OGR libraries (for geospatial processing)</li></ul><h2>Installation</h2><ol><li>Clone this repository:</li></ol><p dir="ltr">Download the zip file</p><pre><pre>cd perception_based_neighbourhoods<br></pre></pre><ol><li>Install required dependencies:</li></ol><pre><pre>pip install -r requirements.txt<br></pre></pre><p dir="ltr">Required libraries include:</p><ul><li>geopandas</li><li>pandas</li><li>numpy</li><li>xarray</li><li>scikit-learn</li><li>matplotlib</li><li>torch (PyTorch)</li><li>efficientnet-pytorch</li></ul><h2>Usage Guide</h2><h3>Step 1: Download Street View Images</h3><p dir="ltr">Download street view images based on the Glasgow grid sampling locations.…”

MCCN Case Study 2 - Spatial projection via modelled data by Donald Hobern (21435904)

“…This study demonstrates: 1) Description of spatial assets using STAC, 2) Loading heterogeneous data sources into a cube, 3) Spatial projection in xarray using different algorithms offered by the <a href="https://pypi.org/project/PyKrige/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">pykrige</a> and <a href="https://pypi.org/project/rioxarray/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">rioxarray</a> packages.…”

Data Sheet 1_Machine learning models integrating intracranial artery calcification to predict outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy.pdf by Guangzong Li (16696443)

“…Eleven ML algorithms were trained and validated using Python, and external validation and performance evaluations were conducted. …”

An Ecological Benchmark of Photo Editing Software: A Comparative Analysis of Local vs. Cloud Workflows by Pierre-Alexis DELAROCHE (22092572)

“…Performance Profiling Algorithms Energy Measurement Methodology # Pseudo-algorithmic representation of measurement protocol def capture_energy_metrics(workflow_type: WorkflowEnum, asset_vector: List[PhotoAsset]) -> EnergyProfile: baseline_power = sample_idle_power_draw(duration=30) with PowerMonitoringContext() as pmc: start_timestamp = rdtsc() # Read time-stamp counter if workflow_type == WorkflowEnum.LOCAL: result = execute_local_pipeline(asset_vector) elif workflow_type == WorkflowEnum.CLOUD: result = execute_cloud_pipeline(asset_vector) end_timestamp = rdtsc() energy_profile = EnergyProfile( duration=cycles_to_seconds(end_timestamp - start_timestamp), peak_power=pmc.get_peak_consumption(), average_power=pmc.get_mean_consumption(), total_energy=integrate_power_curve(pmc.get_power_trace()) ) return energy_profile Statistical Analysis Framework Our analytical pipeline employs advanced statistical methodologies including: Variance Decomposition: ANOVA with nested factors for hardware configuration effects Regression Analysis: Generalized Linear Models (GLM) with log-link functions for energy modeling Temporal Analysis: Fourier transform-based frequency domain analysis of power consumption patterns Cluster Analysis: K-means clustering with Euclidean distance metrics for workflow classification Data Validation and Quality Assurance Measurement Uncertainty Quantification All energy measurements incorporate systematic and random error propagation analysis: Instrument Precision: ±0.1W for CPU power, ±0.5W for GPU power Temporal Resolution: 1ms sampling with Nyquist frequency considerations Calibration Protocol: NIST-traceable power standards with periodic recalibration Environmental Controls: Temperature-compensated measurements in climate-controlled facility Outlier Detection Algorithms Statistical outliers are identified using the Interquartile Range (IQR) method with Tukey's fence criteria (Q₁ - 1.5×IQR, Q₃ + 1.5×IQR). …”