Search alternatives:
algorithm shows » algorithm allows (Expand Search), algorithm flow (Expand Search)
shows function » loss function (Expand Search)
algorithm both » algorithm blood (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search), algorithm etc (Expand Search)
based function » based functional (Expand Search), basis function (Expand Search), basis functions (Expand Search)
both function » body function (Expand Search), growth function (Expand Search), beach function (Expand Search)
algorithm shows » algorithm allows (Expand Search), algorithm flow (Expand Search)
shows function » loss function (Expand Search)
algorithm both » algorithm blood (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search), algorithm etc (Expand Search)
based function » based functional (Expand Search), basis function (Expand Search), basis functions (Expand Search)
both function » body function (Expand Search), growth function (Expand Search), beach function (Expand Search)
-
1
The pseudocode for the NAFPSO algorithm.
Published 2025“…In view of the high-dimensional complexity and local optimal problems, the neighborhood adaptive constrained fractional particle swarm optimization (NACFPSO) algorithm is used to solve it. The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
2
PSO algorithm flowchart.
Published 2025“…In view of the high-dimensional complexity and local optimal problems, the neighborhood adaptive constrained fractional particle swarm optimization (NACFPSO) algorithm is used to solve it. The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
3
Scheduling time of five algorithms.
Published 2025“…In view of the high-dimensional complexity and local optimal problems, the neighborhood adaptive constrained fractional particle swarm optimization (NACFPSO) algorithm is used to solve it. The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
4
Convergence speed of five algorithms.
Published 2025“…In view of the high-dimensional complexity and local optimal problems, the neighborhood adaptive constrained fractional particle swarm optimization (NACFPSO) algorithm is used to solve it. The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
Completion times for different algorithms.
Published 2025“…This paper first analyzes the H-beam processing flow and appropriately simplifies it, develops a reinforcement learning environment for multi-agent scheduling, and applies the rMAPPO algorithm to make scheduling decisions. The effectiveness of the proposed method is then verified on both the physical work cell for riveting and welding and its digital twin platform, and it is compared with other baseline multi-agent reinforcement learning methods (MAPPO, MADDPG, and MASAC). …”
-
8
The average cumulative reward of algorithms.
Published 2025“…This paper first analyzes the H-beam processing flow and appropriately simplifies it, develops a reinforcement learning environment for multi-agent scheduling, and applies the rMAPPO algorithm to make scheduling decisions. The effectiveness of the proposed method is then verified on both the physical work cell for riveting and welding and its digital twin platform, and it is compared with other baseline multi-agent reinforcement learning methods (MAPPO, MADDPG, and MASAC). …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
Simulation settings of rMAPPO algorithm.
Published 2025“…This paper first analyzes the H-beam processing flow and appropriately simplifies it, develops a reinforcement learning environment for multi-agent scheduling, and applies the rMAPPO algorithm to make scheduling decisions. The effectiveness of the proposed method is then verified on both the physical work cell for riveting and welding and its digital twin platform, and it is compared with other baseline multi-agent reinforcement learning methods (MAPPO, MADDPG, and MASAC). …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
The comparison results of all algorithms over 30 functions.
Published 2021Subjects: “…Butterfly Optimization Algorithm…”
-
19
The comparison results of all algorithms over 30 functions.
Published 2021Subjects: “…Butterfly Optimization Algorithm…”
-
20
A hybrid algorithm based on improved threshold function and wavelet transform.
Published 2024Subjects: