Performance metrics under different noise levels. by Jia Li (160557)

“…This paper introduces a novel classification algorithm, ASGBC, intended to tackle related challenges in diagnosing gallbladder cancer using B-ultrasound images. …”

Results of ablation study. by Jia Li (160557)

“…This paper introduces a novel classification algorithm, ASGBC, intended to tackle related challenges in diagnosing gallbladder cancer using B-ultrasound images. …”

Effect of active learning. by Jia Li (160557)

“…This paper introduces a novel classification algorithm, ASGBC, intended to tackle related challenges in diagnosing gallbladder cancer using B-ultrasound images. …”

Indices of fit for two three-factor models. by Mariusz Zięba (21369920)

“…The research aimed to validate the CEAS within a Polish population. The three cross-sectional studies involved a total of 1,219 participants from Poland. …”

SPSS Data File for Sample 3. by Mariusz Zięba (21369920)

“…The research aimed to validate the CEAS within a Polish population. The three cross-sectional studies involved a total of 1,219 participants from Poland. …”

SPSS Data File for Sample 2. by Mariusz Zięba (21369920)

“…The research aimed to validate the CEAS within a Polish population. The three cross-sectional studies involved a total of 1,219 participants from Poland. …”

Gene expression prognosis prediction Comparison. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

LGWO-BP research flowchart. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

miRNA expression prognosis prediction Comparison. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Pearson correlation heatmap of Gene expression. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Grey wolf optimizer schematic diagram. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

DNAmethylation prognosis prediction Comparison. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Outcomes of unimodal benchmarking assessments. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Pearson correlation heatmap of the miRNA. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

The rank sum test p-value. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Gene expression feature importance ranking. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

BP schematic diagram. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

DNAmethylationfeature importance ranking. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Pearson correlation heatmap of DNAmethylation. by Ruiyu Zhan (21602031)

“…For the early-stage diabetes dataset, LGWO-BP achieved an accuracy of 0.92, a recall of 0.93, a precision of 0.88, an F1-score of 0.91, and an AUC of 0.95. Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”

Identification and validation of overlapping genes with potential clinical diagnostic value for CHD. by Bei Tian (1319283)