Showing 1,761 - 1,780 results of 3,694 for search '(( algorithm within function ) OR ((( algorithm python function ) OR ( algorithm i function ))))', query time: 0.43s Refine Results
  1. 1761
  2. 1762

    Order parameters versus temperature for amylase tasks: by Carlos A. Gomez-Uribe (21492788)

    Published 2025
    “…Markers come from BADASS runs, and lines are fits using Eqs 5–7 in <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013119#pcbi.1013119.s001" target="_blank">S1 Text</a>. These were obtained from cooling then heating runs of our algorithm for the amylase task: on the left using the ESM2 mutant marginal score, and on the right using the machine learning model that predicts fitness for stain removal and dp3 function. …”
  3. 1763

    Simulation conditions. by Tuan Anh Nguyen (121944)

    Published 2025
    “…Previous studies often applied only one or several traditional algorithms to control the performance of EPAS systems and ignored the influence of external disturbances. …”
  4. 1764

    System models. by Tuan Anh Nguyen (121944)

    Published 2025
    “…Previous studies often applied only one or several traditional algorithms to control the performance of EPAS systems and ignored the influence of external disturbances. …”
  5. 1765

    Proposed control scheme. by Tuan Anh Nguyen (121944)

    Published 2025
    “…Previous studies often applied only one or several traditional algorithms to control the performance of EPAS systems and ignored the influence of external disturbances. …”
  6. 1766

    Ideal assisted torque. by Tuan Anh Nguyen (121944)

    Published 2025
    “…Previous studies often applied only one or several traditional algorithms to control the performance of EPAS systems and ignored the influence of external disturbances. …”
  7. 1767
  8. 1768
  9. 1769
  10. 1770
  11. 1771
  12. 1772
  13. 1773

    Grid search process. by Lin Qi (128224)

    Published 2025
    “…During the prediction phase, the model performs excellently across different sample types in the test set, achieving a precision (P) of 84%, a recall (R) of 86%, and an F1 score of 85%. Through the model’s interpretability analysis, we find that quality, functionality, and price are key features affecting perceived risk for electronic products. …”
  14. 1774

    Research framework. by Lin Qi (128224)

    Published 2025
    “…During the prediction phase, the model performs excellently across different sample types in the test set, achieving a precision (P) of 84%, a recall (R) of 86%, and an F1 score of 85%. Through the model’s interpretability analysis, we find that quality, functionality, and price are key features affecting perceived risk for electronic products. …”
  15. 1775

    Parameter configuration for TextCNN model. by Lin Qi (128224)

    Published 2025
    “…During the prediction phase, the model performs excellently across different sample types in the test set, achieving a precision (P) of 84%, a recall (R) of 86%, and an F1 score of 85%. Through the model’s interpretability analysis, we find that quality, functionality, and price are key features affecting perceived risk for electronic products. …”
  16. 1776

    Model performance on the validation set. by Lin Qi (128224)

    Published 2025
    “…During the prediction phase, the model performs excellently across different sample types in the test set, achieving a precision (P) of 84%, a recall (R) of 86%, and an F1 score of 85%. Through the model’s interpretability analysis, we find that quality, functionality, and price are key features affecting perceived risk for electronic products. …”
  17. 1777

    Performance comparison of different models. by Lin Qi (128224)

    Published 2025
    “…During the prediction phase, the model performs excellently across different sample types in the test set, achieving a precision (P) of 84%, a recall (R) of 86%, and an F1 score of 85%. Through the model’s interpretability analysis, we find that quality, functionality, and price are key features affecting perceived risk for electronic products. …”
  18. 1778

    Performance evaluation of models on test dataset. by Lin Qi (128224)

    Published 2025
    “…During the prediction phase, the model performs excellently across different sample types in the test set, achieving a precision (P) of 84%, a recall (R) of 86%, and an F1 score of 85%. Through the model’s interpretability analysis, we find that quality, functionality, and price are key features affecting perceived risk for electronic products. …”
  19. 1779

    Topic classification based on KeyBERT-TextCNN. by Lin Qi (128224)

    Published 2025
    “…During the prediction phase, the model performs excellently across different sample types in the test set, achieving a precision (P) of 84%, a recall (R) of 86%, and an F1 score of 85%. Through the model’s interpretability analysis, we find that quality, functionality, and price are key features affecting perceived risk for electronic products. …”
  20. 1780

    Summary of perceived risk dimensions. by Lin Qi (128224)

    Published 2025
    “…During the prediction phase, the model performs excellently across different sample types in the test set, achieving a precision (P) of 84%, a recall (R) of 86%, and an F1 score of 85%. Through the model’s interpretability analysis, we find that quality, functionality, and price are key features affecting perceived risk for electronic products. …”