Search alternatives:
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
-
301
-
302
Trend coefficients and AUC statistics across four control populations (“Pop’n 1” to “Pop’n 4”) and four warming populations (“Pop’n 5” to “Pop’n 8”), as calculated from empirical time series during the approach to criticality. Each statistical metric was calculated within fifteen-day sliding windows, throughout the pre-critical interval. Given that the temperature of the system increased to 12°C on day sixty, we also considered three pre-critical intervals: Days 1 to 60, Days 20 to 60, and Days 30 to 60. Here, we show analyses of empirical time series performed within the sixty-day pre-critical interval. See analyses within the forty- and thirty-day pre-critical intervals in S7 Fig. To evaluate trends in these metrics, we calculated Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient during the pre-critical interval. Negative values indicate a decreasing trend prior to local bifurcation, while positiv
Published 2025“…To evaluate trends in these metrics, we calculated Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient during the pre-critical interval. Negative values indicate a decreasing trend prior to local bifurcation, while positiv</p>…”
-
303
Table 1_The diagnostic and prognostic value of CXCL13, CXCL10, and CXCL8 in patients with neurosyphilis.docx
Published 2025“…The results showed that the AUC value of MODEL1 was 0.888, and the calibration curve and DCA curve demonstrated good accuracy and clinical benefits of the model, demonstrating good predictive performance. …”
-
304
Image 3_The diagnostic and prognostic value of CXCL13, CXCL10, and CXCL8 in patients with neurosyphilis.jpeg
Published 2025“…The results showed that the AUC value of MODEL1 was 0.888, and the calibration curve and DCA curve demonstrated good accuracy and clinical benefits of the model, demonstrating good predictive performance. …”
-
305
Image 1_The diagnostic and prognostic value of CXCL13, CXCL10, and CXCL8 in patients with neurosyphilis.jpeg
Published 2025“…The results showed that the AUC value of MODEL1 was 0.888, and the calibration curve and DCA curve demonstrated good accuracy and clinical benefits of the model, demonstrating good predictive performance. …”
-
306
Image 2_The diagnostic and prognostic value of CXCL13, CXCL10, and CXCL8 in patients with neurosyphilis.jpeg
Published 2025“…The results showed that the AUC value of MODEL1 was 0.888, and the calibration curve and DCA curve demonstrated good accuracy and clinical benefits of the model, demonstrating good predictive performance. …”
-
307
Table 3_The diagnostic and prognostic value of CXCL13, CXCL10, and CXCL8 in patients with neurosyphilis.docx
Published 2025“…The results showed that the AUC value of MODEL1 was 0.888, and the calibration curve and DCA curve demonstrated good accuracy and clinical benefits of the model, demonstrating good predictive performance. …”
-
308
Table 2_The diagnostic and prognostic value of CXCL13, CXCL10, and CXCL8 in patients with neurosyphilis.docx
Published 2025“…The results showed that the AUC value of MODEL1 was 0.888, and the calibration curve and DCA curve demonstrated good accuracy and clinical benefits of the model, demonstrating good predictive performance. …”
-
309
-
310
Image 2_Assessment of heart rate deceleration capacity, heart rate deceleration runs, heart rate acceleration capacity, and lipoprotein-related phospholipase A2 as predictors in in...
Published 2025“…Moreover, the areas under the ROC curves showed that the combination of five variables and AC + Lp-PLA2 were 0.970 (95% CI, 0.923–0.992) and 0.940 (95% CI, 0.882–0.974) were larger than each single indicator alone.</p>Conclusion<p>Distinctive alterations in dynamic electrocardiogram-related indicators reveal a decline in autonomic nervous functions among individuals with dementia. …”
-
311
Image 4_Assessment of heart rate deceleration capacity, heart rate deceleration runs, heart rate acceleration capacity, and lipoprotein-related phospholipase A2 as predictors in in...
Published 2025“…Moreover, the areas under the ROC curves showed that the combination of five variables and AC + Lp-PLA2 were 0.970 (95% CI, 0.923–0.992) and 0.940 (95% CI, 0.882–0.974) were larger than each single indicator alone.</p>Conclusion<p>Distinctive alterations in dynamic electrocardiogram-related indicators reveal a decline in autonomic nervous functions among individuals with dementia. …”
-
312
Image 3_Assessment of heart rate deceleration capacity, heart rate deceleration runs, heart rate acceleration capacity, and lipoprotein-related phospholipase A2 as predictors in in...
Published 2025“…Moreover, the areas under the ROC curves showed that the combination of five variables and AC + Lp-PLA2 were 0.970 (95% CI, 0.923–0.992) and 0.940 (95% CI, 0.882–0.974) were larger than each single indicator alone.</p>Conclusion<p>Distinctive alterations in dynamic electrocardiogram-related indicators reveal a decline in autonomic nervous functions among individuals with dementia. …”
-
313
Image 1_Assessment of heart rate deceleration capacity, heart rate deceleration runs, heart rate acceleration capacity, and lipoprotein-related phospholipase A2 as predictors in in...
Published 2025“…Moreover, the areas under the ROC curves showed that the combination of five variables and AC + Lp-PLA2 were 0.970 (95% CI, 0.923–0.992) and 0.940 (95% CI, 0.882–0.974) were larger than each single indicator alone.</p>Conclusion<p>Distinctive alterations in dynamic electrocardiogram-related indicators reveal a decline in autonomic nervous functions among individuals with dementia. …”
-
314
-
315
Supplementary Material for: The value of circulating tumor DNA in the prognostic diagnosis of bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 2025“…A random-effects model was used to calculate SEN, SPE, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC, and the heterogeneity among studies and publication bias were also assessed. …”
-
316
-
317
Data.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
318
Baseline characteristics of patients.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
319
-
320
Exclusion and enrollment summary from NHANES.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Background</p><p>Blood-cell-based inflammatory biomarkers are increasingly recognized for their diagnostic value in infections due to their clinical accessibility. …”