Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
a greatest » a greater (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
a greatest » a greater (Expand Search)
-
1
Differentially expressed genes (DEGs)<sup>a</sup> showing the greatest fold changes from each potato tissue: 10 with greatest increase in expression and 10 with greatest decrease in expression.
Published 2025“…<p>Differentially expressed genes (DEGs)<sup>a</sup> showing the greatest fold changes from each potato tissue: 10 with greatest increase in expression and 10 with greatest decrease in expression.…”
-
2
-
3
ROC curve and AUC value of all models.
Published 2024“…As for Specificity (82.94%) and ROC-AUC (82.13%), the Multilayer Perceptron with SGD optimizer obtained the highest scores. …”
-
4
-
5
Significantly Enriched Pathways.
Published 2025“…Pathway analysis revealed a marked decrease in expression within certain key metabolic pathways (such as the one-carbon pool by folate) in the NAFLD group, while expression in DNA repair-related pathways (such as non-homologous end joining) was significantly increased. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Statistical analysis of the AUC measurement.
Published 2025“…<p>Analysis indicated that INSv application significantly changed spontaneous calcium activity (IAsp <i>p</i>-value: 0.1290, INSv <i>p</i>-value: 0.0002). The mean AUC decreased in both samples.…”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
AUC statistics comparing statistical trends in control and test populations.
Published 2025“…<p>To evaluate statistical trends, we calculated Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient during the pre-critical interval (here, days one to sixty), and compared control (constant temperature, non-epidemic) and warming (warming treatment, epidemic emergence) coefficients across simulations and experimental populations by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) statistic. Values less than 0.5 suggest that a decrease in the statistical metric indicates emergence, while values greater than 0.5 suggest that an increase in the statistical metric indicates emergence, with more extreme values indicating stronger trends. …”