Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
mri also » may also (Expand Search), men also (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
mri also » may also (Expand Search), men also (Expand Search)
-
201
Data_Sheet_1_Functional Hyperconnectivity and Task-Based Activity Changes Associated With Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study.docx
Published 2021“…We developed a novel somatosensory attention task to identify short term fluctuations in neural activity related to NP vs. non-painful somatosensation using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We also collected high-resolution resting state fMRI to identify connectivity-based correlations over time between the two groups. …”
-
202
Table_1_The Impact of Spatial Normalization Strategies on the Temporal Features of the Resting-State Functional MRI: Spatial Normalization Before rs-fMRI Features Calculation May R...
Published 2019“…Our results indicated that Prenorm may induce algorithmic intersubject variability on tSNR and reduce its reliability, which also significantly affected ALFF and ReHo. We suggest using Postnorm instead of Prenorm for future rs-fMRI studies using ALFF/ReHo.…”
-
203
Presentation_1_Key considerations for child and adolescent MRI data collection.pdf
Published 2022“…In this discussion, we focus on collecting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, as it is one of the more complex protocols used with children and youth. …”
-
204
-
205
Percent difference in Precision-Recall AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for pooled models relative to eBird-only models.
Published 2025“…<p>Precision-Recall AUC and sensitivity were higher in all species (positive values); decreases in specificity, present in all species, were more minor (negative values, note differences in x-axis scales between panels).…”
-
206
Table_1_Verbal Training Induces Enhanced Functional Connectivity in Japanese Healthy Elderly Population.docx
Published 2022“…<p>This study employs fMRI to examine the neural substrates of response to cognitive training in healthy old adults. …”
-
207
AUC statistics as calculated from simulated time series. Each statistical metric was calculated within sliding windows, throughout the pre-critical interval. We considered five-, fifteen-, and thirty-day sliding windows. Given that the temperature of the system increased to 12°C on day sixty, we also considered three pre-critical intervals: Days 1 to 60, Days 20 to 60, and Days 30 to 60. To evaluate trends in these metrics, we calculated Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient during the pre-critical interval, and compared control (constant temperature, non-epidemic) and warming (warming treatment, epidemic emergence) coefficients across simulations and experimental populations by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) statistic. Values less than 0.5 suggest that a decrease in the statistical metric indicates emergence, while values greater than 0.5 suggest that an increase in the statistical metric indicates emergence, with more extreme values indicating stronger tre
Published 2025“…To evaluate trends in these metrics, we calculated Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient during the pre-critical interval, and compared control (constant temperature, non-epidemic) and warming (warming treatment, epidemic emergence) coefficients across simulations and experimental populations by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) statistic. Values less than 0.5 suggest that a decrease in the statistical metric indicates emergence, while values greater than 0.5 suggest that an increase in the statistical metric indicates emergence, with more extreme values indicating stronger tre</p>…”
-
208
Image_1_Effects of variability in manually contoured spinal cord masks on fMRI co-registration and interpretation.eps
Published 2022“…Although group-level activation maps differed between raters, no systematic bias was identified. Increasing consistency in manual contouring of spinal cord fMRI data improved co-registration and inter-rater agreement in activation mapping, however our results suggest that improvements in image acquisition and post-processing are also critical to address.…”
-
209
Image_3_Effects of variability in manually contoured spinal cord masks on fMRI co-registration and interpretation.eps
Published 2022“…Although group-level activation maps differed between raters, no systematic bias was identified. Increasing consistency in manual contouring of spinal cord fMRI data improved co-registration and inter-rater agreement in activation mapping, however our results suggest that improvements in image acquisition and post-processing are also critical to address.…”
-
210
Image_4_Effects of variability in manually contoured spinal cord masks on fMRI co-registration and interpretation.eps
Published 2022“…Although group-level activation maps differed between raters, no systematic bias was identified. Increasing consistency in manual contouring of spinal cord fMRI data improved co-registration and inter-rater agreement in activation mapping, however our results suggest that improvements in image acquisition and post-processing are also critical to address.…”
-
211
Image_2_Effects of variability in manually contoured spinal cord masks on fMRI co-registration and interpretation.eps
Published 2022“…Although group-level activation maps differed between raters, no systematic bias was identified. Increasing consistency in manual contouring of spinal cord fMRI data improved co-registration and inter-rater agreement in activation mapping, however our results suggest that improvements in image acquisition and post-processing are also critical to address.…”
-
212
-
213
-
214
A forward modelling approach for the estimation of oxygen extraction fraction by calibrated fMRI
Published 2024“…One potential MRI method for the measurement of CMRO2 is via the combination of fMRI and cerebral blood flow (CBF) data acquired during periods of hypercapnic and hyperoxic challenges. …”
-
215
Video_9_Sampling Rate Effects on Resting State fMRI Metrics.AVI
Published 2019“…In this study, we examine the effect of sampling rate on currently used rs-fMRI FC metrics. Ultra-fast fMRI magnetic resonance encephalography (MREG) data, sampled with TR 0.1 s, was downsampled to different subsampled repetition times (sTR, range 0.3–3 s) for comparisons. …”
-
216
Video_2_Sampling Rate Effects on Resting State fMRI Metrics.AVI
Published 2019“…In this study, we examine the effect of sampling rate on currently used rs-fMRI FC metrics. Ultra-fast fMRI magnetic resonance encephalography (MREG) data, sampled with TR 0.1 s, was downsampled to different subsampled repetition times (sTR, range 0.3–3 s) for comparisons. …”
-
217
Video_3_Sampling Rate Effects on Resting State fMRI Metrics.AVI
Published 2019“…In this study, we examine the effect of sampling rate on currently used rs-fMRI FC metrics. Ultra-fast fMRI magnetic resonance encephalography (MREG) data, sampled with TR 0.1 s, was downsampled to different subsampled repetition times (sTR, range 0.3–3 s) for comparisons. …”
-
218
Video_1_Sampling Rate Effects on Resting State fMRI Metrics.AVI
Published 2019“…In this study, we examine the effect of sampling rate on currently used rs-fMRI FC metrics. Ultra-fast fMRI magnetic resonance encephalography (MREG) data, sampled with TR 0.1 s, was downsampled to different subsampled repetition times (sTR, range 0.3–3 s) for comparisons. …”
-
219
Video_4_Sampling Rate Effects on Resting State fMRI Metrics.AVI
Published 2019“…In this study, we examine the effect of sampling rate on currently used rs-fMRI FC metrics. Ultra-fast fMRI magnetic resonance encephalography (MREG) data, sampled with TR 0.1 s, was downsampled to different subsampled repetition times (sTR, range 0.3–3 s) for comparisons. …”
-
220
Video_7_Sampling Rate Effects on Resting State fMRI Metrics.AVI
Published 2019“…In this study, we examine the effect of sampling rate on currently used rs-fMRI FC metrics. Ultra-fast fMRI magnetic resonance encephalography (MREG) data, sampled with TR 0.1 s, was downsampled to different subsampled repetition times (sTR, range 0.3–3 s) for comparisons. …”