Showing 181 - 200 results of 2,687 for search '(( auc values increased ) OR ( ct largest decrease ))*', query time: 0.23s Refine Results
  1. 181
  2. 182
  3. 183
  4. 184
  5. 185
  6. 186
  7. 187
  8. 188
  9. 189
  10. 190
  11. 191

    AUC statistics as calculated from simulated time series. Each statistical metric was calculated within sliding windows, throughout the pre-critical interval. We considered five-, fifteen-, and thirty-day sliding windows. Given that the temperature of the system increased to 12°C on day sixty, we also considered three pre-critical intervals: Days 1 to 60, Days 20 to 60, and Days 30 to 60. To evaluate trends in these metrics, we calculated Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient during the pre-critical interval, and compared control (constant temperature, non-epidemic) and warming (warming treatment, epidemic emergence) coefficients across simulations and experimental populations by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) statistic. Values less than 0.5 suggest that a decrease in the statistical metric indicates emergence, while values greater than 0.5 suggest that an increase in the statistical metric indicates emergence, with more extreme values indicating stronger tre by Madeline Jarvis-Cross (22394247)

    Published 2025
    “…To evaluate trends in these metrics, we calculated Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient during the pre-critical interval, and compared control (constant temperature, non-epidemic) and warming (warming treatment, epidemic emergence) coefficients across simulations and experimental populations by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) statistic. Values less than 0.5 suggest that a decrease in the statistical metric indicates emergence, while values greater than 0.5 suggest that an increase in the statistical metric indicates emergence, with more extreme values indicating stronger tre</p>…”
  12. 192
  13. 193
  14. 194

    Predictive Models for Human Organ Toxicity Based on <i>In Vitro</i> Bioactivity Data and Chemical Structure by Tuan Xu (338730)

    Published 2020
    “…The top four models, with AUC-ROC values >0.8, were derived for endocrine (0.90 ± 0.00), musculoskeletal (0.88 ± 0.02), peripheral nerve and sensation (0.85 ± 0.01), and brain and coverings (0.83 ± 0.02) toxicities, whereas the best model AUC-ROC values were >0.7 for the remaining 10 toxicities. …”
  15. 195
  16. 196
  17. 197
  18. 198
  19. 199
  20. 200