Search alternatives:
marker decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
n decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
a marker » _ marker (Expand Search), _ markers (Expand Search)
b large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search)
marker decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
n decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
a marker » _ marker (Expand Search), _ markers (Expand Search)
b large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
List of Included studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
13
The search strategy in three databases.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
14
NIH score.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
15
List of excluded studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
16
Relationship between the Gender Representation Disparity Index (GRDI) and average explicit sex markers in film criticism, illustrating a decrease in markers as the GRDI moves toward a female-dominated cast.
Published 2025“…<p>Relationship between the Gender Representation Disparity Index (GRDI) and average explicit sex markers in film criticism, illustrating a decrease in markers as the GRDI moves toward a female-dominated cast.…”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20