Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
A heat map to compare the associated resistances outlined in Table 1 and [14] with the IRP values.
Published 2024Subjects: -
6
-
7
The values for <i>k</i><sub>cat</sub> and <i>K</i><sub>M</sub> are sourced from [19].
Published 2024Subjects: -
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
The values approximated and calculated for and for the WT and each mutant Abl1 enzyme.
Published 2024Subjects: -
14
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…If power was above the threshold (<i>z</i> > 1.96) for a minimum of 10% of the time window (500 ms) after the cue, the channel was considered hemifield-selective. …”
-
15
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Published 2025“…Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.</p>…”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Manhattan plot of minJSW decrease at 24 months. The Manhattan plots show the -log10(P) values of all ~ 1,5 million SNPs against their position. …”
-
20
Comparison of the RMSD values for AlphaFold biomphalysin predictions.
Published 2025“…This indicates very similar/conserved structure organization of all domains I/ small lobes, despite very relatively low sequence identity (15% of values are above 60% identity -<a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013225#ppat.1013225.s011" target="_blank">S11B Fig</a>). …”