Showing 1 - 20 results of 3,119 for search '(( based ((semi decrease) OR (step decrease)) ) OR ( a ((larger decrease) OR (marked decrease)) ))', query time: 0.53s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Strength test results of semi-circular specimens. by Yining Wang (432154)

    Published 2025
    “…Fatigue test results reveal that the ZM modifier markedly extends fatigue life, with a maximum increase of 128.9%, and reduces fatigue sensitivity to the stress ratio. …”
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

    Modeling the Shape and Stability of Co Nanoparticles as a Function of Size and Support Interactions through DFT Calculations and Monte Carlo Simulations by Enrico Sireci (12127349)

    Published 2025
    “…We report a marked increase in step and kink sites at the expense of terraces with increasing particle size, which we linked to the experimentally observed increase in turnover frequency (TOF). …”
  13. 13
  14. 14

    Biases in larger populations. by Sander W. Keemink (21253563)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Table of step height. by Jianbo Jia (717814)

    Published 2024
    “…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
  19. 19

    The well wall step. by Jianbo Jia (717814)

    Published 2024
    “…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
  20. 20