Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Comparison of the RMSD values for AlphaFold biomphalysin predictions.
Published 2025“…This indicates very similar/conserved structure organization of all domains I/ small lobes, despite very relatively low sequence identity (15% of values are above 60% identity -<a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013225#ppat.1013225.s011" target="_blank">S11B Fig</a>). …”
-
6
The values for <i>k</i><sub>cat</sub> and <i>K</i><sub>M</sub> are sourced from [19].
Published 2024Subjects: -
7
The values approximated and calculated for and for the WT and each mutant Abl1 enzyme.
Published 2024Subjects: -
8
-
9
-
10
A heat map to compare the associated resistances outlined in Table 1 and [14] with the IRP values.
Published 2024Subjects: -
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
PT<sub>50</sub> values of GO and GO-GA NPs against <i>Callosobruchus maculatus.</i>
Published 2025Subjects: -
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20