Showing 1 - 20 results of 3,075 for search '(( based ((snp decrease) OR (step decrease)) ) OR ( a ((larger decrease) OR (marked decrease)) ))', query time: 0.38s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

    Modeling the Shape and Stability of Co Nanoparticles as a Function of Size and Support Interactions through DFT Calculations and Monte Carlo Simulations by Enrico Sireci (12127349)

    Published 2025
    “…We report a marked increase in step and kink sites at the expense of terraces with increasing particle size, which we linked to the experimentally observed increase in turnover frequency (TOF). …”
  11. 11
  12. 12

    Biases in larger populations. by Sander W. Keemink (21253563)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
  13. 13

    Data for <b><i>Mixing in moderation: slow transmission of macroparasites following a population augmentation of an endangered Australian skink</i></b><b>” by Bonnie Derne, Stephani... by Michael Gardner (11354787)

    Published 2025
    “…Ordination and STRUCTURE analyses of SNP markers revealed population-based genetic structure, particularly for <i>P. wandillahensis</i>. …”
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

    Table of step height. by Jianbo Jia (717814)

    Published 2024
    “…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
  17. 17

    The well wall step. by Jianbo Jia (717814)

    Published 2024
    “…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20