Illustration of the transformed binary images of normal, benign, and malignant samples into grayscale. by Tehnan I. A. Mohamed (16846175)

Dynamic resource allocation process. by Yixian Wen (12201388)

“…Subsequently, we implement an optimal binary tree decision-making algorithm, grounded in dynamic programming, to achieve precise allocation of elastic resources within data streams, significantly bolstering resource utilization. …”

Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Reverse engineering information flow using stimulus-encoding and stimulus-transfer estimation algorithms. by Gabriel Matías Lorenz (21094672)

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Confusion matrix. by Yixian Wen (12201388)

“…Subsequently, we implement an optimal binary tree decision-making algorithm, grounded in dynamic programming, to achieve precise allocation of elastic resources within data streams, significantly bolstering resource utilization. …”

Parameter settings. by Yixian Wen (12201388)

“…Subsequently, we implement an optimal binary tree decision-making algorithm, grounded in dynamic programming, to achieve precise allocation of elastic resources within data streams, significantly bolstering resource utilization. …”

Event-driven data flow processing. by Yixian Wen (12201388)

“…Subsequently, we implement an optimal binary tree decision-making algorithm, grounded in dynamic programming, to achieve precise allocation of elastic resources within data streams, significantly bolstering resource utilization. …”

Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Precision recall curve. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Fortran & C++: design fractal-type optical diffractive element by I-Lin Ho (13768960)

“…</p> <p>(2) calculate diffraction fields for fractal and/or grid-matrix (binary) phase-holograms.</p> <p>(3) optimize the fractal and/or grid-matrix holograms for given target diffraction images, using annealing algorithms. …”

Data_Sheet_1_Multiclass Classification Based on Combined Motor Imageries.pdf by Cecilia Lindig-León (7889777)

“…And we propose two new multilabel uses of the Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) algorithm to optimize the signal-to-noise ratio, namely MC2CMI and MC2SMI approaches. …”

Thesis-RAMIS-Figs_Slides by Felipe Santibañez-Leal (10967991)

“…<br><br>Finally, although the developed concepts, ideas and algorithms have been developed for inverse problems in geostatistics, the results are applicable to a wide range of disciplines where similar sampling problems need to be faced, included but not limited to design of communication networks, optimal integration and communication of swarms of robots and drones, remote sensing.…”

Comparison of penalized logistic regression models for rare event case by Hülya Olmuş (7494017)

Seed mix selection model by Bethanne Bruninga-Socolar (10923639)

“…</p> <p>  </p> <p>We applied the seed mix selection model using a binary genetic algorithm to select seed mixes (R package ‘GA’; Scrucca 2013; Scrucca 2017). …”