Showing 141 - 160 results of 183 for search '(( binary a feature optimization algorithm ) OR ( binary time process optimization algorithm ))', query time: 0.60s Refine Results
  1. 141

    Unraveling Adsorbate-Induced Structural Evolution of Iron Carbide Nanoparticles by Peter S. Rice (11805875)

    Published 2025
    “…Lastly, we explore correlations between geometric and electronic features of the active sites and the adsorption of H (H<sub>ads</sub>), using a regularized random forest machine learning algorithm. …”
  2. 142

    Contextual Dynamic Pricing with Strategic Buyers by Pangpang Liu (18886419)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Personalized pricing, which involves tailoring prices based on individual characteristics, is commonly used by firms to implement a consumer-specific pricing policy. In this process, buyers can also strategically manipulate their feature data to obtain a lower price, incurring certain manipulation costs. …”
  3. 143
  4. 144

    Summary of literature review. by Muhammad Ayyaz Sheikh (18610943)

    Published 2024
    “…To overcome this limitation, recent advancements have introduced multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for ATS. This study proposes an enhancement to the performance of ATS through the utilization of an improved version of the Binary Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (BMOGWO), incorporating mutation. …”
  5. 145

    Topic description. by Muhammad Ayyaz Sheikh (18610943)

    Published 2024
    “…To overcome this limitation, recent advancements have introduced multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for ATS. This study proposes an enhancement to the performance of ATS through the utilization of an improved version of the Binary Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (BMOGWO), incorporating mutation. …”
  6. 146

    Notations along with their descriptions. by Muhammad Ayyaz Sheikh (18610943)

    Published 2024
    “…To overcome this limitation, recent advancements have introduced multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for ATS. This study proposes an enhancement to the performance of ATS through the utilization of an improved version of the Binary Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (BMOGWO), incorporating mutation. …”
  7. 147

    Detail of the topics extracted from DUC2002. by Muhammad Ayyaz Sheikh (18610943)

    Published 2024
    “…To overcome this limitation, recent advancements have introduced multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for ATS. This study proposes an enhancement to the performance of ATS through the utilization of an improved version of the Binary Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (BMOGWO), incorporating mutation. …”
  8. 148
  9. 149
  10. 150

    Flowchart scheme of the ML-based model. by Noshaba Qasmi (20405009)

    Published 2024
    “…<b>Fii)</b> Texture information using local binary patterns. <b>Fiii)</b> Additional texture information using Haralick texture features. …”
  11. 151
  12. 152

    DataSheet_1_Raman Spectroscopic Differentiation of Streptococcus pneumoniae From Other Streptococci Using Laboratory Strains and Clinical Isolates.pdf by Marcel Dahms (9160118)

    Published 2022
    “…Improvement of the classification rate is expected with optimized model parameters and algorithms as well as with a larger spectral data base for training.…”
  13. 153
  14. 154
  15. 155

    Solubility Prediction of Different Forms of Pharmaceuticals in Single and Mixed Solvents Using Symmetric Electrolyte Nonrandom Two-Liquid Segment Activity Coefficient Model by Getachew S. Molla (6416744)

    Published 2019
    “…A particle swarm optimization algorithm is incorporated to preregress conceptual segment parameters of solutes. …”
  16. 156

    GSE96058 information. by Sepideh Zununi Vahed (9861298)

    Published 2024
    “…Initially, the data was organized and underwent hold-out cross-validation, data cleaning, and normalization. Subsequently, feature selection was conducted using ANOVA and binary Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). …”
  17. 157

    The performance of classifiers. by Sepideh Zununi Vahed (9861298)

    Published 2024
    “…Initially, the data was organized and underwent hold-out cross-validation, data cleaning, and normalization. Subsequently, feature selection was conducted using ANOVA and binary Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). …”
  18. 158

    Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  19. 159

    Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  20. 160

    Precision recall curve. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”