Search alternatives:
risk classification » based classification (Expand Search), class classification (Expand Search), _ classification (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
binary task » binary mask (Expand Search)
task based » risk based (Expand Search)
binary a » binary _ (Expand Search), binary b (Expand Search), hilary a (Expand Search)
a risk » _ risk (Expand Search)
risk classification » based classification (Expand Search), class classification (Expand Search), _ classification (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
binary task » binary mask (Expand Search)
task based » risk based (Expand Search)
binary a » binary _ (Expand Search), binary b (Expand Search), hilary a (Expand Search)
a risk » _ risk (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Proposed Algorithm.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
3
Comparisons between ADAM and NADAM optimizers.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
4
Table 1_A comparative analysis of binary and multi-class classification machine learning algorithms to detect current frailty status using the English longitudinal study of ageing...
Published 2025“…</p>Conclusion<p>Machine learning algorithms show promise for the detection of current frailty status, particularly in binary classification. …”
-
5
The Pseudo-Code of the IRBMO Algorithm.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
6
IRBMO vs. meta-heuristic algorithms boxplot.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
7
IRBMO vs. feature selection algorithm boxplot.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
8
-
9
An Example of a WPT-MEC Network.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
10
Related Work Summary.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
11
Simulation parameters.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
12
Training losses for N = 10.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
13
Normalized computation rate for N = 10.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
14
Summary of Notations Used in this paper.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
15
-
16
Comparison with previous studies.
Published 2023“…Three datasets were used for the experiment: the male, female, and entire dataset. A cutoff for binary classification was defined as the meaningful as a screening test (<132 g/m<sup>2</sup> vs. ≥132 g/m<sup>2</sup>, <109 g/m<sup>2</sup> vs. ≥109 g/m<sup>2</sup>). …”
-
17
Dataset characteristics.
Published 2023“…Three datasets were used for the experiment: the male, female, and entire dataset. A cutoff for binary classification was defined as the meaningful as a screening test (<132 g/m<sup>2</sup> vs. ≥132 g/m<sup>2</sup>, <109 g/m<sup>2</sup> vs. ≥109 g/m<sup>2</sup>). …”
-
18
Acronym table.
Published 2023“…Three datasets were used for the experiment: the male, female, and entire dataset. A cutoff for binary classification was defined as the meaningful as a screening test (<132 g/m<sup>2</sup> vs. ≥132 g/m<sup>2</sup>, <109 g/m<sup>2</sup> vs. ≥109 g/m<sup>2</sup>). …”
-
19
Pseudo Code of RBMO.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
20
P-value on CEC-2017(Dim = 30).
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”