Search alternatives:
network optimization » swarm optimization (Expand Search), wolf optimization (Expand Search)
robust optimization » process optimization (Expand Search), robust estimation (Expand Search), joint optimization (Expand Search)
binary based » library based (Expand Search), linac based (Expand Search), binary mask (Expand Search)
binary a » binary _ (Expand Search), binary b (Expand Search), hilary a (Expand Search)
a robust » _ robust (Expand Search)
network optimization » swarm optimization (Expand Search), wolf optimization (Expand Search)
robust optimization » process optimization (Expand Search), robust estimation (Expand Search), joint optimization (Expand Search)
binary based » library based (Expand Search), linac based (Expand Search), binary mask (Expand Search)
binary a » binary _ (Expand Search), binary b (Expand Search), hilary a (Expand Search)
a robust » _ robust (Expand Search)
-
81
Memory storage behavior.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
82
Elite search behavior.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
83
Description of the datasets.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
84
S and V shaped transfer functions.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
85
S- and V-Type transfer function diagrams.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
86
Collaborative hunting behavior.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
87
Friedman average rank sum test results.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
88
IRBMO vs. variant comparison adaptation data.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
89
Multicategory Angle-Based Learning for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes With Censored Data
Published 2021“…Specifically, the proposed method obtains the optimal DTR via integrating estimations of decision rules at multiple stages into a single multicategory classification algorithm without imposing additional constraints, which is also more computationally efficient and robust. …”
-
90
-
91
Testing results for classifying AD, MCI and NC.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This study aims to develop an optimally performing convolutional neural network to classify Alzheimer’s disease into mild cognitive impairment, normal controls, or Alzheimer’s disease classes using a magnetic resonance imaging dataset. …”
-
92
Summary of existing CNN models.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This study aims to develop an optimally performing convolutional neural network to classify Alzheimer’s disease into mild cognitive impairment, normal controls, or Alzheimer’s disease classes using a magnetic resonance imaging dataset. …”
-
93
Data_Sheet_1_Prediction of Mental Health in Medical Workers During COVID-19 Based on Machine Learning.ZIP
Published 2021“…In this study, we propose a novel prediction model based on optimization algorithm and neural network, which can select and rank the most important factors that affect mental health of medical workers. …”
-
94
Table_1_An efficient decision support system for leukemia identification utilizing nature-inspired deep feature optimization.pdf
Published 2024“…To optimize feature selection, a customized binary Grey Wolf Algorithm is utilized, achieving an impressive 80% reduction in feature size while preserving key discriminative information. …”
-
95
Supplementary file 1_Comparative evaluation of fast-learning classification algorithms for urban forest tree species identification using EO-1 hyperion hyperspectral imagery.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Methods<p>Thirteen supervised classification algorithms were comparatively evaluated, encompassing traditional spectral/statistical classifiers—Maximum Likelihood, Mahalanobis Distance, Minimum Distance, Parallelepiped, Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM), Spectral Information Divergence (SID), and Binary Encoding—and machine learning algorithms including Decision Tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). …”
-
96
Processed dataset to train and test the WGAN-GP_IMOA_DA_Ensemble model
Published 2025“…This framework integrates a novel biologically inspired optimization algorithm, the Indian Millipede Optimization Algorithm (IMOA), for effective feature selection. …”
-
97
-
98
Data_Sheet_1_Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Biomarker Analysis Using Resting-State Functional MRI Functional Brain Network With Multi-Measures Features and Hippocampal Subfield...
Published 2022“…Finally, we implemented and compared the different feature selection algorithms to integrate the structural features, brain networks, and voxel features to optimize the diagnostic identifications of AD using support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. …”
-
99
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
100
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”