Search alternatives:
codings optimization » codon optimization (Expand Search), joint optimization (Expand Search), routing optimization (Expand Search)
robust optimization » process optimization (Expand Search), robust estimation (Expand Search), joint optimization (Expand Search)
data codings » data recordings (Expand Search), data encoding (Expand Search), data codes (Expand Search)
binary data » primary data (Expand Search), dietary data (Expand Search)
binary a » binary _ (Expand Search), binary b (Expand Search), hilary a (Expand Search)
a robust » _ robust (Expand Search)
codings optimization » codon optimization (Expand Search), joint optimization (Expand Search), routing optimization (Expand Search)
robust optimization » process optimization (Expand Search), robust estimation (Expand Search), joint optimization (Expand Search)
data codings » data recordings (Expand Search), data encoding (Expand Search), data codes (Expand Search)
binary data » primary data (Expand Search), dietary data (Expand Search)
binary a » binary _ (Expand Search), binary b (Expand Search), hilary a (Expand Search)
a robust » _ robust (Expand Search)
-
21
Elite search behavior.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
22
Description of the datasets.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
23
S and V shaped transfer functions.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
24
S- and V-Type transfer function diagrams.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
25
Collaborative hunting behavior.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
26
Friedman average rank sum test results.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
27
IRBMO vs. variant comparison adaptation data.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
28
Multicategory Angle-Based Learning for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes With Censored Data
Published 2021“…Specifically, the proposed method obtains the optimal DTR via integrating estimations of decision rules at multiple stages into a single multicategory classification algorithm without imposing additional constraints, which is also more computationally efficient and robust. …”
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
33
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
34
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
35
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
36
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
37
Image 1_A multimodal AI-driven framework for cardiovascular screening and risk assessment in diverse athletic populations: innovations in sports cardiology.png
Published 2025“…CardioSpectra formulates athlete profiles as multivariate probabilistic entities across latent diagnostic states, using sparsity-aware inference to generate interpretable risk predictions while optimizing a sensitivity-specificity trade-off tailored to clinical priorities. …”
-
38
Models and Dataset
Published 2025“…<p dir="ltr"><b>P3DE (Parameter-less Population Pyramid with Deep Ensemble):</b><br>P3DE is a hybrid feature selection framework that combines the Parameter-less Population Pyramid (P3) metaheuristic optimization algorithm with a deep ensemble of autoencoders. …”
-
39
Processed dataset to train and test the WGAN-GP_IMOA_DA_Ensemble model
Published 2025“…This framework integrates a novel biologically inspired optimization algorithm, the Indian Millipede Optimization Algorithm (IMOA), for effective feature selection. …”
-
40
Predictive Analysis of Mushroom Toxicity Based Exclusively on Their Natural Habitat.
Published 2025“…<p dir="ltr">Objective<br><br>To evaluate the predictive ability of the "habitat" variable, in isolation, to determine mushroom toxicity (edible or poisonous) using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification model, investigating whether this single feature is sufficient to build a robust and reliable classifier. …”