بدائل البحث:
robust optimization » process optimization (توسيع البحث), robust estimation (توسيع البحث), joint optimization (توسيع البحث)
based optimization » whale optimization (توسيع البحث)
binary mask » binary image (توسيع البحث)
mask based » task based (توسيع البحث), tasks based (توسيع البحث), risk based (توسيع البحث)
binary a » binary _ (توسيع البحث), binary b (توسيع البحث), hilary a (توسيع البحث)
a robust » _ robust (توسيع البحث)
robust optimization » process optimization (توسيع البحث), robust estimation (توسيع البحث), joint optimization (توسيع البحث)
based optimization » whale optimization (توسيع البحث)
binary mask » binary image (توسيع البحث)
mask based » task based (توسيع البحث), tasks based (توسيع البحث), risk based (توسيع البحث)
binary a » binary _ (توسيع البحث), binary b (توسيع البحث), hilary a (توسيع البحث)
a robust » _ robust (توسيع البحث)
-
21
Description of the datasets.
منشور في 2025"…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …"
-
22
S and V shaped transfer functions.
منشور في 2025"…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …"
-
23
S- and V-Type transfer function diagrams.
منشور في 2025"…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …"
-
24
Collaborative hunting behavior.
منشور في 2025"…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …"
-
25
Friedman average rank sum test results.
منشور في 2025"…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …"
-
26
IRBMO vs. variant comparison adaptation data.
منشور في 2025"…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …"
-
27
Multicategory Angle-Based Learning for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes With Censored Data
منشور في 2021"…Specifically, the proposed method obtains the optimal DTR via integrating estimations of decision rules at multiple stages into a single multicategory classification algorithm without imposing additional constraints, which is also more computationally efficient and robust. …"
-
28
Algoritmo de clasificación de expresiones de odio por tipos en español (Algorithm for classifying hate expressions by type in Spanish)
منشور في 2024"…</p><h2>Model Architecture</h2><p dir="ltr">The model is based on <code>pysentimiento/robertuito-base-uncased</code> with the following modifications:</p><ul><li>A dense classification layer was added over the base model</li><li>Uses input IDs and attention masks as inputs</li><li>Generates a multi-class classification with 5 hate categories</li></ul><h2>Dataset</h2><p dir="ltr"><b>HATEMEDIA Dataset</b>: Custom hate speech dataset with categorization by type:</p><ul><li><b>Labels</b>: 5 hate type categories (0-4)</li><li><b>Preprocessing</b>:</li><li>Null values removed from text and labels</li><li>Reindexing and relabeling (original labels are adjusted by subtracting 1)</li><li>Exclusion of category 2 during training</li><li>Conversion of category 5 to category 2</li></ul><h2>Training Process</h2><h3>Configuration</h3><ul><li><b>Batch size</b>: 128</li><li><b>Epoches</b>: 5</li><li><b>Learning rate</b>: 2e-5 with 10% warmup steps</li><li><b>Early stopping</b> with patience=2</li><li><b>Class weights</b>: Balanced to handle class imbalance</li></ul><h3>Custom Metrics</h3><ul><li>Recall for specific classes (focus on class 2)</li><li>Precision for specific classes (focus on class 3)</li><li>F1-score (weighted)</li><li>AUC-PR</li><li>Recall at precision=0.6 (class 3)</li><li>Precision at recall=0.6 (class 2)</li></ul><h2>Evaluation Metrics</h2><p dir="ltr">The model is evaluated using:</p><ul><li>Macro recall, precision, and F1-score</li><li>One-vs-Rest AUC</li><li>Accuracy</li><li>Per-class metrics</li><li>Confusion matrix</li><li>Full classification report</li></ul><h2>Technical Features</h2><h3>Data Preprocessing</h3><ul><li><b>Tokenization</b>: Maximum length of 128 tokens (truncation and padding)</li><li><b>Encoding of labels</b>: One-hot encoding for multi-class classification</li><li><b>Data split</b>: 80% training, 10% validation, 10% testing</li></ul><h3>Optimization</h3><ul><li><b>Optimizer</b>: Adam with linear warmup scheduling</li><li><b>Loss function</b>: Categorical Crossentropy (from_logits=True)</li><li><b>Imbalance handling</b>: Class weights computed automatically</li></ul><h2>Requirements</h2><p dir="ltr">The following Python packages are required:</p><ul><li>TensorFlow</li><li>Transformers</li><li>scikit-learn</li><li>pandas</li><li>datasets</li><li>matplotlib</li><li>seaborn</li><li>numpy</li></ul><h2>Usage</h2><ol><li><b>Data format</b>:</li></ol><ul><li>CSV file or Pandas DataFrame</li><li>Required column name: <code>text</code> (string type)</li><li>Required column name: Data type label (integer type, 0-4) - optional for evaluation</li></ul><ol><li><b>Text preprocessing</b>:</li></ol><ul><li>Automatic tokenization with a maximum length of 128 tokens</li><li>Long texts will be automatically truncated</li><li>Handling of special characters, URLs, and emojis included</li></ul><ol><li><b>Label encoding</b>:</li></ol><ul><li>The model classifies hate speech into 5 categories (0-4)</li><li><code>0</code>: Political hatred: Expressions directed against individuals or groups based on political orientation.…"
-
29
-
30
Steps in the extraction of 14 coordinates from the CT slices for the curved MPR.
منشور في 2025"…Protruding paths are then eliminated using graph-based optimization algorithms, as demonstrated in f). …"
-
31
Sample image for illustration.
منشور في 2024"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"
-
32
Comparison analysis of computation time.
منشور في 2024"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"
-
33
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
منشور في 2024"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"
-
34
Precision recall curve.
منشور في 2024"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"
-
35
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
منشور في 2024"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"
-
36
Image 1_A multimodal AI-driven framework for cardiovascular screening and risk assessment in diverse athletic populations: innovations in sports cardiology.png
منشور في 2025"…CardioSpectra formulates athlete profiles as multivariate probabilistic entities across latent diagnostic states, using sparsity-aware inference to generate interpretable risk predictions while optimizing a sensitivity-specificity trade-off tailored to clinical priorities. …"
-
37
Models and Dataset
منشور في 2025"…<p dir="ltr"><b>P3DE (Parameter-less Population Pyramid with Deep Ensemble):</b><br>P3DE is a hybrid feature selection framework that combines the Parameter-less Population Pyramid (P3) metaheuristic optimization algorithm with a deep ensemble of autoencoders. …"
-
38
Processed dataset to train and test the WGAN-GP_IMOA_DA_Ensemble model
منشور في 2025"…This framework integrates a novel biologically inspired optimization algorithm, the Indian Millipede Optimization Algorithm (IMOA), for effective feature selection. …"
-
39
Predictive Analysis of Mushroom Toxicity Based Exclusively on Their Natural Habitat.
منشور في 2025"…<p dir="ltr">Objective<br><br>To evaluate the predictive ability of the "habitat" variable, in isolation, to determine mushroom toxicity (edible or poisonous) using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification model, investigating whether this single feature is sufficient to build a robust and reliable classifier. …"
-
40
DataSheet_1_Near infrared spectroscopy for cooking time classification of cassava genotypes.docx
منشور في 2024"…The accuracy of the optimal scenario for classifying samples with a cooking time of 30 minutes reached RCal2 = 0.86 and RVal2 = 0.84, with a Kappa value of 0.53. …"