Search alternatives:
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
wolf optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search), swarm optimization (Expand Search), _ optimization (Expand Search)
binary aged » binary image (Expand Search)
lines based » lens based (Expand Search), genes based (Expand Search), lines used (Expand Search)
aged based » agent based (Expand Search), acid based (Expand Search), seed based (Expand Search)
based wolf » based whole (Expand Search), based work (Expand Search), based well (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
wolf optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search), swarm optimization (Expand Search), _ optimization (Expand Search)
binary aged » binary image (Expand Search)
lines based » lens based (Expand Search), genes based (Expand Search), lines used (Expand Search)
aged based » agent based (Expand Search), acid based (Expand Search), seed based (Expand Search)
based wolf » based whole (Expand Search), based work (Expand Search), based well (Expand Search)
-
1
Performance on GradEva.
Published 2024“…The sequences generated by our algorithm identify points that satisfy the first-order necessary condition for Pareto optimality. …”
-
2
The considered test problems.
Published 2024“…The sequences generated by our algorithm identify points that satisfy the first-order necessary condition for Pareto optimality. …”
-
3
Performance on FunEva.
Published 2024“…The sequences generated by our algorithm identify points that satisfy the first-order necessary condition for Pareto optimality. …”
-
4
Performance on Iter.
Published 2024“…The sequences generated by our algorithm identify points that satisfy the first-order necessary condition for Pareto optimality. …”
-
5
Continuation of Table 2.
Published 2024“…The sequences generated by our algorithm identify points that satisfy the first-order necessary condition for Pareto optimality. …”
-
6
-
7
SHAP bar plot.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
8
Sample screening flowchart.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
9
Descriptive statistics for variables.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
10
SHAP summary plot.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
11
ROC curves for the test set of four models.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
12
Display of the web prediction interface.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
DataSheet_1_Multi-Parametric MRI-Based Radiomics Models for Predicting Molecular Subtype and Androgen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer.docx
Published 2021“…We applied several feature selection strategies including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and recursive feature elimination (RFE), the maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR), Boruta and Pearson correlation analysis, to select the most optimal features. We then built 120 diagnostic models using distinct classification algorithms and feature sets divided by MRI sequences and selection strategies to predict molecular subtype and AR expression of breast cancer in the testing dataset of leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). …”
-
19
-
20