Search alternatives:
dosage optimization » dose optimization (Expand Search), design optimization (Expand Search), whale optimization (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
binary using » injury using (Expand Search)
using dosage » using dose (Expand Search), using storage (Expand Search), using age (Expand Search)
aging based » imaging based (Expand Search)
dosage optimization » dose optimization (Expand Search), design optimization (Expand Search), whale optimization (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
binary using » injury using (Expand Search)
using dosage » using dose (Expand Search), using storage (Expand Search), using age (Expand Search)
aging based » imaging based (Expand Search)
-
1
Flow diagram of the proposed model.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Machine learning models are increasingly applied to assisted reproductive technologies (ART), yet most studies rely on conventional algorithms with limited optimization. This proof-of-concept study investigates whether a hybrid Logistic Regression–Artificial Bee Colony (LR–ABC) framework can enhance predictive performance in in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes while producing interpretable, hypothesis-driven associations with nutritional and pharmaceutical supplement use. …”
-
2
SHAP bar plot.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
3
Sample screening flowchart.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
4
Descriptive statistics for variables.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
5
SHAP summary plot.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
6
ROC curves for the test set of four models.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
7
Display of the web prediction interface.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
DataSheet_1_Multi-Parametric MRI-Based Radiomics Models for Predicting Molecular Subtype and Androgen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer.docx
Published 2021“…We applied several feature selection strategies including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and recursive feature elimination (RFE), the maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR), Boruta and Pearson correlation analysis, to select the most optimal features. We then built 120 diagnostic models using distinct classification algorithms and feature sets divided by MRI sequences and selection strategies to predict molecular subtype and AR expression of breast cancer in the testing dataset of leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). …”
-
15
Machine Learning-Ready Dataset for Cytotoxicity Prediction of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles
Published 2025“…</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Applications and Model Compatibility:</b></p><p dir="ltr">The dataset is optimized for use in supervised learning workflows and has been tested with algorithms such as:</p><p dir="ltr">Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM),</p><p dir="ltr">Support Vector Machines (SVM-RBF),</p><p dir="ltr">Random Forests, and</p><p dir="ltr">Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for feature reduction.…”