Search alternatives:
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
aging design » making design (Expand Search), using design (Expand Search), varying design (Expand Search)
aging based » imaging based (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
aging design » making design (Expand Search), using design (Expand Search), varying design (Expand Search)
aging based » imaging based (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
SHAP bar plot.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
3
Sample screening flowchart.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
4
Descriptive statistics for variables.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
5
SHAP summary plot.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
6
ROC curves for the test set of four models.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
7
Display of the web prediction interface.
Published 2025“…Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
DataSheet_1_Multi-Parametric MRI-Based Radiomics Models for Predicting Molecular Subtype and Androgen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer.docx
Published 2021“…We applied several feature selection strategies including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and recursive feature elimination (RFE), the maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR), Boruta and Pearson correlation analysis, to select the most optimal features. We then built 120 diagnostic models using distinct classification algorithms and feature sets divided by MRI sequences and selection strategies to predict molecular subtype and AR expression of breast cancer in the testing dataset of leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). …”
-
15
Table 1_Heavy metal biomarkers and their impact on hearing loss risk: a machine learning framework analysis.docx
Published 2025“…., blood lead and cadmium levels) were analyzed as features, with hearing loss status—defined as a pure-tone average threshold exceeding 25 dB HL across 500, 1,000, 2000, and 4,000 Hz in the better ear—serving as the binary outcome. Multiple machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting, Logistic Regression, CatBoost, and MLP, were optimized and evaluated. …”