Search alternatives:
structure optimization » structural optimization (Expand Search), structure determination (Expand Search)
reduced optimization » required optimization (Expand Search), resource optimization (Expand Search), based optimization (Expand Search)
structure optimization » structural optimization (Expand Search), structure determination (Expand Search)
reduced optimization » required optimization (Expand Search), resource optimization (Expand Search), based optimization (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Analysis and design of algorithms for the manufacturing process of integrated circuits
Published 2023“…This process can be modeled as a combinatorial optimization problem where the objective is to reduce the total distance the robotic arm must travel to pick up each chip and place it in its corresponding position within the support structure. …”
-
11
the functioning of BRPSO.
Published 2025“…A sensitivity analysis of key RFD parameters, including frictional moment and rigid beam length, highlights their influence on seismic performance. The optimization problem is formulated based on the seismic energy dissipation concept, employing a modified binary and real-coded particle swarm optimization (BRPSO) algorithm. …”
-
12
Characteristic of 6- and 10-story SMRF [99,98].
Published 2025“…A sensitivity analysis of key RFD parameters, including frictional moment and rigid beam length, highlights their influence on seismic performance. The optimization problem is formulated based on the seismic energy dissipation concept, employing a modified binary and real-coded particle swarm optimization (BRPSO) algorithm. …”
-
13
The RFD’s behavior mechanism (2002).
Published 2025“…A sensitivity analysis of key RFD parameters, including frictional moment and rigid beam length, highlights their influence on seismic performance. The optimization problem is formulated based on the seismic energy dissipation concept, employing a modified binary and real-coded particle swarm optimization (BRPSO) algorithm. …”
-
14
-
15
Melanoma Skin Cancer Detection Using Deep Learning Methods and Binary GWO Algorithm
Published 2025“…By leveraging the binary GWO algorithm to optimize the feature selection </p><p dir="ltr">process and CNNs for image classification, the proposed approach reduces computational costs while increasing </p><p dir="ltr">classification accuracy. …”
-
16
Classification baseline performance.
Published 2025“…Crucially, this optimization also results in a substantial clinical performance gain, with sensitivity increasing from 86.02% to 98.34% (+12.32%), specificity rising from 86.53% to 98.14% (+11.61%), and the false negative rate being significantly reduced, thereby enhancing diagnostic reliability in critical scenarios. …”
-
17
Feature selection results.
Published 2025“…Crucially, this optimization also results in a substantial clinical performance gain, with sensitivity increasing from 86.02% to 98.34% (+12.32%), specificity rising from 86.53% to 98.14% (+11.61%), and the false negative rate being significantly reduced, thereby enhancing diagnostic reliability in critical scenarios. …”
-
18
ANOVA test result.
Published 2025“…Crucially, this optimization also results in a substantial clinical performance gain, with sensitivity increasing from 86.02% to 98.34% (+12.32%), specificity rising from 86.53% to 98.14% (+11.61%), and the false negative rate being significantly reduced, thereby enhancing diagnostic reliability in critical scenarios. …”
-
19
Summary of literature review.
Published 2025“…Crucially, this optimization also results in a substantial clinical performance gain, with sensitivity increasing from 86.02% to 98.34% (+12.32%), specificity rising from 86.53% to 98.14% (+11.61%), and the false negative rate being significantly reduced, thereby enhancing diagnostic reliability in critical scenarios. …”
-
20