Showing 1 - 17 results of 17 for search '(( binary art wolf optimization algorithm ) OR ( binary image robust optimization algorithm ))*', query time: 0.33s Refine Results
  1. 1

    The flowchart of the proposed algorithm. by Muhammad Ayyaz Sheikh (18610943)

    Published 2024
    “…To overcome this limitation, recent advancements have introduced multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for ATS. This study proposes an enhancement to the performance of ATS through the utilization of an improved version of the Binary Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (BMOGWO), incorporating mutation. …”
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Melanoma Skin Cancer Detection Using Deep Learning Methods and Binary GWO Algorithm by Hussein Ali Bardan (21976208)

    Published 2025
    “…In this work, we propose a novel framework that integrates </p><p dir="ltr">Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for image classification and a binary Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) </p><p dir="ltr">algorithm for feature selection. …”
  4. 4

    Summary of literature review. by Muhammad Ayyaz Sheikh (18610943)

    Published 2024
    “…To overcome this limitation, recent advancements have introduced multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for ATS. This study proposes an enhancement to the performance of ATS through the utilization of an improved version of the Binary Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (BMOGWO), incorporating mutation. …”
  5. 5

    Topic description. by Muhammad Ayyaz Sheikh (18610943)

    Published 2024
    “…To overcome this limitation, recent advancements have introduced multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for ATS. This study proposes an enhancement to the performance of ATS through the utilization of an improved version of the Binary Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (BMOGWO), incorporating mutation. …”
  6. 6

    Notations along with their descriptions. by Muhammad Ayyaz Sheikh (18610943)

    Published 2024
    “…To overcome this limitation, recent advancements have introduced multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for ATS. This study proposes an enhancement to the performance of ATS through the utilization of an improved version of the Binary Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (BMOGWO), incorporating mutation. …”
  7. 7

    Detail of the topics extracted from DUC2002. by Muhammad Ayyaz Sheikh (18610943)

    Published 2024
    “…To overcome this limitation, recent advancements have introduced multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for ATS. This study proposes an enhancement to the performance of ATS through the utilization of an improved version of the Binary Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (BMOGWO), incorporating mutation. …”
  8. 8

    A new fast filtering algorithm for a 3D point cloud based on RGB-D information by Chaochuan Jia (7256237)

    Published 2019
    “…Then, the optimal segmentation threshold of the V image that is calculated by using the Otsu algorithm is applied to segment the color mapping image into a binary image, which is used to extract the valid point cloud from the original point cloud with outliers. …”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

    Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  12. 12

    Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  13. 13

    Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  14. 14

    Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  15. 15

    Precision recall curve. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  16. 16
  17. 17