Search alternatives:
complex optimization » convex optimization (Expand Search), whale optimization (Expand Search), wolf optimization (Expand Search)
policy optimization » topology optimization (Expand Search), wolf optimization (Expand Search), process optimization (Expand Search)
primase complex » kinase complex (Expand Search), promote complex (Expand Search), peptidase complex (Expand Search)
binary primase » binary image (Expand Search)
binary b » binary _ (Expand Search)
b policy » tb policy (Expand Search), _ policy (Expand Search), a policy (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 28 for search '(( binary b policy optimization algorithm ) OR ( binary primase complex optimization algorithm ))', query time: 0.36s Refine Results
  1. 1
    a) Accuracy and b) selected feature size of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset.

    a) Accuracy and b) selected feature size of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    Proposed Algorithm.

    Proposed Algorithm. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Optimization of tracking parameters based on <i>P</i><sub><i>swap</i></sub>.

    Optimization of tracking parameters based on <i>P</i><sub><i>swap</i></sub>. by Benjamin Gallois (10131683)

    Published 2021
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Comparisons between ADAM and NADAM optimizers.

    Comparisons between ADAM and NADAM optimizers. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Comparison between Bisection and Newton-Raphson in terms of (A) total time consumed, and (B) maximum computation rate.

    Comparison between Bisection and Newton-Raphson in terms of (A) total time consumed, and (B) maximum computation rate. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    Comparisons of computation rate performance for different offloading algorithms.for N = 10, 20, 30.

    Comparisons of computation rate performance for different offloading algorithms.for N = 10, 20, 30. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Comparison of total time consumed for different offloading algorithms.for N = 10, 20, 30.

    Comparison of total time consumed for different offloading algorithms.for N = 10, 20, 30. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Hierarchical clustering to infer a binary tree with <i>K</i> = 4 sampled populations.

    Hierarchical clustering to infer a binary tree with <i>K</i> = 4 sampled populations. by Tristan Mary-Huard (3864)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    Design and implementation of the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) algorithm for predicting the severity of COVID-19.

    Design and implementation of the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) algorithm for predicting the severity of COVID-19. by Jiaqing Luo (10975030)

    Published 2021
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Performance Comparison of State-of-the-Art WPT-MEC Offloading Methods.

    Performance Comparison of State-of-the-Art WPT-MEC Offloading Methods. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    CDF of task latency, approximated as the inverse of the achieved computation rate.

    CDF of task latency, approximated as the inverse of the achieved computation rate. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    The evolution of the Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) time fraction β over simulation frames.

    The evolution of the Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) time fraction β over simulation frames. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    An Example of a WPT-MEC Network.

    An Example of a WPT-MEC Network. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    Related Work Summary.

    Related Work Summary. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    Simulation parameters.

    Simulation parameters. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    Training losses for N = 10.

    Training losses for N = 10. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    Normalized computation rate for N = 10.

    Normalized computation rate for N = 10. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    Summary of Notations Used in this paper.

    Summary of Notations Used in this paper. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    Random forest model performs better than support vector machine algorithms and when it primarily uses spontaneous photopic ERG of 60-s duration in humans.

    Random forest model performs better than support vector machine algorithms and when it primarily uses spontaneous photopic ERG of 60-s duration in humans. by Ramsés Noguez Imm (6658637)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    Model performance and benchmarking for multiclass MOA and 30S/50S protein-synthesis classifiers.

    Model performance and benchmarking for multiclass MOA and 30S/50S protein-synthesis classifiers. by Josh L. Espinoza (10492448)

    Published 2021
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: