a) Accuracy and b) selected feature size of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

A radar plot illustrating the comparison of the classification accuracy, cost values, and fitness values for the hybrids of BEOSA when applied to some medium-sized dimensional data... by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

A radar plot illustrating the comparison of the classification accuracy, cost values, and fitness values for the hybrids of BEOSA when applied to some small-sized dimensional datas... by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

An illustration and comparison of the fitness convergence curves for the Large-scale dataset (WaveformEW), medium-scale dataset (Zoo dataset), and Small-scale (Wine dataset) using... by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

An illustration and comparison of the cost convergence curves for the Large-scale dataset (WaveformEW), medium-scale dataset (Zoo dataset), and Small-scale (Wine dataset) using 50... by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

A radar plot illustrating the comparison of the classification accuracy, cost values, and fitness values for the hybrids of BEOSA when applied to some high-dimensional datasets usi... by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

<i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow. by Michela C. Massi (14599915)

Texas Rio Grande Valley Red–crowned Parrot predicted general use habitat distribution as determined via a consensus-based feature ensemble of 12 calibrated (binary presence/absence... by Elise Varaela Voltura (17592996)

Texas Rio Grande Valley Red–crowned Parrot predicted roost site habitat distribution as determined via a consensus-based feature ensemble of 12 calibrated (binary presence/absence)... by Elise Varaela Voltura (17592996)

Texas Rio Grande Valley Red–crowned Parrot predicted nest site habitat distribution as determined via a consensus-based feature ensemble of 12 calibrated (binary presence/absence)... by Elise Varaela Voltura (17592996)

The overlap of Texas Rio Grande Valley Red–crowned Parrot predicted general use, roost site, and nest site habitat distributions as determined using consensus-based feature ensembl... by Elise Varaela Voltura (17592996)

Optimal Timings Codebook.xlsx by Emma Spillane (11249121)

Optimal Time Intervals of Breech Births Dataset by Emma Spillane (11249121)

Fig 3 - by Ali Ahmed (2567584)

Algoritmo de clasificación de expresiones de odio por tipos en español (Algorithm for classifying hate expressions by type in Spanish) by Daniel Pérez Palau (11097348)

“…</li></ul><p dir="ltr"><b>File Structure</b></p><p dir="ltr">The code generates and saves:</p><ul><li>Weights of the trained model (.h5)</li><li>Configured tokenizer</li><li>Training history in CSV</li><li>Requirements file</li></ul><p dir="ltr"><b>Important Notes</b></p><ul><li>The model excludes category 2 during training</li><li>Implements transfer learning from a pre-trained model for binary hate detection</li><li>Includes early stopping callbacks to prevent overfitting</li><li>Uses class weighting to handle category imbalances</li></ul><p dir="ltr">The process of creating this algorithm is explained in the technical report located at: Blanco-Valencia, X., De Gregorio-Vicente, O., Ruiz Iniesta, A., & Said-Hung, E. (2025). …”

Solubility Prediction of Different Forms of Pharmaceuticals in Single and Mixed Solvents Using Symmetric Electrolyte Nonrandom Two-Liquid Segment Activity Coefficient Model by Getachew S. Molla (6416744)

Appendix B - distributional maps by Flavio Mariano Machado Mota (12113163)

Image processing workflow. by Denis Tamiev (7404980)

“…All image segments of cell clusters were standardized to the same size with either (b) Null Bumper, (b) Blended or (d) Masked methods. …”

Validation of image processing steps and metric results using images of a microfluidic device. by Gavrielle R. Untracht (11820311)

Machine Learning-Ready Dataset for Cytotoxicity Prediction of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles by Soham Savarkar (21811825)

“…</p><p dir="ltr">Encoding: Categorical variables such as surface coating and cell type were grouped into logical classes and label-encoded to enable model compatibility.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Applications and Model Compatibility:</b></p><p dir="ltr">The dataset is optimized for use in supervised learning workflows and has been tested with algorithms such as:</p><p dir="ltr">Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM),</p><p dir="ltr">Support Vector Machines (SVM-RBF),</p><p dir="ltr">Random Forests, and</p><p dir="ltr">Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for feature reduction.…”